Deepak Chopra and Intent

Deepak Chopra and Intent


Skepticism and a Million Dollar Challenge (Part 2)

posted by Admin

When I made a video offering a million dollars to anyone who could explain how the brain produces the appearance of the three-dimensional world, I didn’t have a publicity stunt in mind. I wanted to draw attention to consciousness research, which has been burgeoning. The public isn’t aware of how big a turn-around this represents. For a long time consciousness was taboo in the scientific community. The reason isn’t hard to fathom. To explore consciousness means delving into subjectivity, the personal inner world. Science deals in objectivity, data, and hard facts instead.

 

Yet there is no substantive reason why science shouldn’t go on a journey inward, the actual difficulty being that resistance was strong. All kinds of things occur in our inner world that scientists are reluctant to confront, including spirituality, art, morals, emotions, and so on. There’s a general assumption, which is quite wrong, that all of these activities can be reduced to brain functions, and only then will the mind be subjugated to the scientific method and its demand for data and hard facts.

 

This is an example of the materialistic fallacy, the notion that once you understand the physical side of a phenomenon, you understand the phenomenon itself. In the previous post we touched on the hostility generated by the skeptic movement, which sees itself as the arch defender of science and materialism. As part of its purpose, the skeptic movement is all about debunking. It zealously lumps together hoaxsters, charlatans, faith healers, and stage illusionists with Jesus, the Buddha, all people of faith, and the world’s wisdom traditions. Throw them all out, the skeptical dogma proclaims, and the world will be better for it.

 

The emotional side of the debate grabs headlines, as when Richard Dawkins attends a rally in London demanding that the Pope be tried for crimes against humanity (which follows his core belief that religion lies at the heart of “all evil”). But emotion and prejudice cloud a real and very positive change in science. Not the abandonment of materialism, although it’s become shakier as a world view for explaining all things, rather, there is a rising generation of researchers and thinkers who now take consciousness seriously.

 

Their rallying point is the so-called “hard problem,” named by David Chalmers, an Australian philosopher and cognitive scientist who gave a tag to a centuries-old mystery:  How does the brain relate to the mind? Materialists argue that the hard problem is solved by brain function, since it can be shown with certainty that various areas of the brain light up on an fMRI as a person thinks, feels, or acts in a certain way. But this is by no means convincing. The brain is totally dark and silent, yet somehow it evokes a world of light and sound. The brain is filled with trillions of separate electrical and chemical events, yet these separate occurrences cohere into a unified picture of reality.

 

In no way has any scientist been able to detect the point at which molecules of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon–the building blocks of the brain–begin to  think. It is merely assumed by materialists that the brain is the same as the mind.  This is like seeing an empty car in a parking lot and assuming that it drives itself. The mind is invisible and therefore can be detected (or so materialism argues) by examining its physical traces, which are detectable as brain activity. This only deepens the fallacy. Would you claim to understand Mozart because you can take apart a radio that plays his music?

 

The hard problem lies at the basis of my million dollar challenge to skeptics. That it is met with contemptuous ridicule by professional skeptics means very little–they do what they do, scurrilous and dishonest as it winds up being. The Amazing Randi’s million dollar paranormal challenge, suspended after ten years in 2010, is trumpeted as proof that the paranormal is a fraud. In fact, the conditions of the prize set up multiple hurdles and catches to insure that the money couldn’t be won. I insist that the whole project is a red herring, a distraction from the issues posed by consciousness. The paranormal will never be settled until the normal is explained. The greatest miracle isn’t raising the dead but the everyday experience by which reality emerges in our awareness. I’m willing to endure the bad faith of the skeptic movement to bring to light how vital it is for human evolution to solve the mystery of reality, without prejudice, false assumptions, second-hand beliefs, and spiteful animus.

 

Deepak Chopra, MD is the author of more than 80 books with twenty-two New York Times bestsellers including Super Brainco-authored with Rudi Tanzi, Phd. He serves as the founder of The Chopra Foundation and co-founder of The Chopra Center for Wellbeing. Join him at The Chopra Foundation Sages and Scientists Symposium 2014. www.choprafoundation.org



Advertisement
Comments Post the First Comment »
post a comment

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

God Is the New Physics
When spirituality and physics started to be linked, many scientists called it the use of metaphor. It couldn't literally be true that there was a Tao of Physics that linked quantum mechanics to ancient Chinese philosophy. At best there might be a weak link--God and the new physics--the way one might

posted 10:54:59am Dec. 15, 2014 | read full post »

Will God 2.0 Be Indispensable in Ten Years?
The primary difficult with God isn't belief--more than 80% of US responders tell pollsters that they believe God exists. The problem is that God is irrelevant, providing few if any practical benefits in daily life. In an age of faith the circumstances were in God's favor. When people got sick or die

posted 1:58:33pm Dec. 08, 2014 | read full post »

Why Physics Needs God But God Doesn't Need Physics
Recently I created a brief storm on Twitter by throwing out questions that physicists can't answer. Twitter allows you to contact famous physicists directly, and it's predictable that a handful will become irritated and even riled up if you dare to challenge them. "What happens in physics stays in p

posted 10:19:20am Dec. 01, 2014 | read full post »

Why God Makes More Sense than Atheism
After two centuries of the tug-of-war between science and religion, it's clear science occupies the dominant position. It has passed the "So what?" test, meaning that science as applied to practical daily life has been immensely more important to modern people than God. This has given atheism, both

posted 10:39:29am Nov. 24, 2014 | read full post »

How Richard Dawkins Lost His Battle with God
When he wrote his 2006 best-seller, The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins expected to accomplish two aims that have proved to be remarkable failures. The first aim was social. He wanted to attract a horde of doubters, fence-sitters, and agnostics to gather their courage and join the atheist ranks. This

posted 11:50:49am Nov. 17, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.