Deepak Chopra and Intent

Deepak Chopra and Intent


We Could Use God’s Help – Where Is He?

posted by Admin

Tragedies like the Newtown shootings and the devastation from Hurricane Sandy test people’s faith in God. When God fails to intervene in human suffering, the acceptance of a loving deity who cares for his children arouses fresh doubts. For centuries, God’s failure to perform has been blamed on worshippers. Sin, temptation, human frailty, the seduction of evil – a whole range of faults belong to us rather than God. Even in an age that is much less strict in matters of religion, “What did I do wrong?” is a thought that lurks in the mind when bad things happen.

 

What if we erase the slate and look clearly at the situation.  Something terrible happens, people suffer, they implore God for help, but no help comes. If such a thing occurred when a house caught fire and the fire trucks never came, naturally the blame would fall on those who are assigned to rescue us. Is it fair to apply the same standard to a God who fails to show up?

 

The atheist position on this question is both simple and certain. God doesn’t show up because he doesn’t exist.  But the rest of us are likely to feel mixed emotions. When you look at yourself and ask where you stand on the God issue, you are almost certainly in one of the following situations:

Unbelief: You don’t accept that God is real, and your unbelief is expressed by living as if God makes no difference.

Faith: You hope that God is real, and your hope is expressed as faith.

Knowledge:  You have no doubt that God is real, and therefore you live as if God is always present.

When someone becomes a spiritual seeker, they want to move from unbelief to knowledge.  The path is by no means clear, however.  Yet without actual knowledge of God, no one can settle a basic question like “Should God be relied upon to heal suffering or divert disasters?”  Short of true knowledge, you either shrug God off for being useless in the everyday world or you take on faith that his infinite wisdom reaches beyond our limited perspective – in other words, suffering fits into the divine plan.

Let’s say that you recognize yourself in one of these three states of unbelief, faith, and knowledge.  It’s quite all right if they are jumbled and you have passing moments of each.  What feels like a muddle could actually be a path. Unbelief can lead to faith and faith to true knowledge.  This holds true for many other things in life, only we don’t use religious terms for it. When you learn to ride a bike, or roller-skate, or how to be in love, uncertainty dominates at first, then you begin to believe that you’re getting somewhere, and finally you know that you are there.

It’s ironic that the band of militant atheists who have attracted so much public attention, like Richard Dawkins base their unbelief on evolution. In reality they don’t believe that spirituality can evolve. They are stuck on one note – religion is a primitive throwback – which makes no sense on any level. The history of civilization is paralleled by the evolution of religious thought. Thomas Aquinas and the Buddha weren’t exactly sitting around a fire chipping at arrow heads, but militant atheists make their unbelief look like “progress.”

If there is a path to God, we are asking the big questions while in a muddled state; with clarity, these questions may have credible answers. Certainly a secular age isn’t going to back pedal and return to dogmatic faith. At the same time, spiritual experiences are natural and universal; they have always existed and still do, which means that God is available, if he exists. (For the moment I’ll use the conventional “he,” although the deity has no gender and shouldn’t been seen in the image of a human being).

God is hidden somewhere, as a presence, in all three situations, whether as a negative (the deity you are fleeing from when you walk away from organized religion) or as a positive (a higher reality that you aspire to). Being faintly present isn’t the same as being truly important, much less the most important thing in existence.  If it was possible to make God real again, I think everyone would agree to try. In the next series of posts, I’d like to trace how unbelief can lead to God. This isn’t a way to validate organized religion or to defend the God of any particular religion. What we’ll be interested in is discovering what makes God real, living, and true.

 

(To be cont.)

 

www.deepakchopra.com

Follow Deepak on Twitter

 



Advertisement
Comments read comments(1)
post a comment
Tom D

posted February 8, 2013 at 1:08 pm


Actually God is alive and well or we wouldn’t be! Since God is “All That Is”, He/She/It includes the “good” the “bad” and each one of us PLUS everything else. There can be nothing without God whether we choose to believe in it or not. By our choices we create our reality just as God chose to allow us (AKA himself) to make those choices so he could experience the infinite possibilities of who he is. Nevertheless all of this diversity springs from the ONE essence of God which is first existance itself and second consciousness. We all share in that essence and cannot separate ourselves from it no matter what choices we make. Namaste!



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Do Your Emotions Help You or Hold You Back?
Recently, a close friend of mine made the remark that our emotions for the most part are basic, primal, immature, and unevolved. Ever since then, I have been ruminating on the validity of this statement. If our emotions are basically primitive, then how they be our allies, especially on the path to

posted 10:52:25am Jan. 26, 2015 | read full post »

Powers of Mind: In Praise of Subtle Actions
At a time when the mass of headlines seem to be about the brain, artificial intelligence, robotics, and smarter computers, not enough is said about the mind. When reduced to a mechanism, the mind somehow is thought to turn into the brain, with no difference between them. It's true that the brain see

posted 10:51:38am Jan. 19, 2015 | read full post »

Can Science and Religion Save Each Other? (Part 2)
Science is used to being dominant, and religion is used to being defensive--these are familiar poses for two worldviews, the one being on the rise, the other on the decline. Generally when an entire belief system is on the decline, it steadily disappears. There's no need to believe that the king's t

posted 10:29:24am Jan. 12, 2015 | read full post »

Can Science and Religion Save Each Other?
A flurry of controversy surrounded the astronomer Neil deGrasse Tyson two weeks ago when he took a jab at religion in the name of science. It began Christmas day with a mischievous tweet: “On this day long ago, a child was born who, by age 30, would transform the world. Happy Birthday Isaac Newton

posted 3:36:40pm Jan. 05, 2015 | read full post »

How to Save the World--A Simple Answer
Around a decade ago, when I first started posting at Huffington Post, one entry considered the world's four greatest problems. They were over-population, climate change, pandemic disease, and refugeeism. Despite the suffering and fear it creates, terrorism affects far fewer people than these four is

posted 10:11:57am Dec. 22, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.