Deepak Chopra and Intent

Deepak Chopra and Intent


How About an “American Spring”?

posted by Admin

Anyone who has admired President Obama’s idealism all along should come away
inspired by the high-mindedness of his “Arab spring” speech. It served to
reassure his liberal base that he wasn’t solely continuing the Bush policy
in the Middle East (i.e., kill every terrorist, ignore human rights, let
Israel drift, keep the oil flowing). It put the conservative Israeli regime
on notice, along with some minor allies like Yemen and Bahrain. Those were
the points that might cause the powers that be to feel nervous for five
minutes. The rest of the speech, a lofty high five for reform in the Middle
East, was more problematic.

Obama referred to his 2009 Cairo speech that extended an olive branch to the
Muslim world, reversing Bush’s belligerent “clash of civilizations” stance.
Lofty as those declarations were two years ago, the intervening time has
been one of inertia. Guantanamo remains a thorn in our side; Iraq
continually totters; Afghanistan remains chaotic; Pakistan is a client state
bought off with bribes basically because they have the atom bomb. In the
face of such inertia, what can ideals do? If asked whether they would
support freedom movements in Saudi Arabia, for example, in exchange for
gasoline at $6 a gallon, the average American would jump ship on lofty
ideals.

As in so many areas, such as health care, immigration, and energy policy,
Obama combined visionary- in-chief with professor-in-chief. He’s good in
those roles, but a global President needs a global nation to follow him. I’m
not sure that we are really there yet. Reactionary politics held sway in the
2010 election; the economy teeters precariously; people feel like drawing in
their horns. Even in good times it would be hard for any visionary to
reverse the right-wing trends that have dominated American politics since
the Reagan era. In other word, without an American spring, the Arab spring
is still on its own. This country will keep supporting despots and royal
families in the Middle East; we will demand the free flow of oil, which is
the same as capitulating totally to the oil oligarchs that hold the world
ransom; and we won’t stop being the world’s largest arms dealers.

It’s not idealism that is at fault here; it’s self-contradiction. You can’t
be at peace and war simultaneously, reactionary and visionary, friendly to
reform and despots. Obama needs to thread his way through these
contradictions. Given his character, I believe that he’s trying. His
idealism rings true. But countless idealists have broken their heads against
hard realities. The best hope I can take away now is India, a place that is
thriving even though the government is corrupt, bribes are a way of life,
vast millions are illiterate, religious intolerance simmers beneath the
surface, elites jealously guard their privilege, and gender inequality is
shockingly rampant. Obama mentioned all those things in his speech, and it’s
heartening to realize that the dispossessed people of the world, starting
with so little, facing such heartbreaking obstacles, can still rise. The
silent power of idealism may be able to accomplish more than hardened
realists realize. Let’s hope so, especially at this uncertain moment.

Deepak Chopra on Intent.com
deepakchopra.com
Follow Deepak on Twitter



Advertisement
Comments read comments(1)
post a comment
Bruce Madeley

posted May 26, 2011 at 2:38 am


I believe we should withdraw all our troops from the middle east along with other countries where we maintain bases. If these countries wish for us to maintain our bases in their coutry, we will have to agree upon a fee for us to remain there.
Also, effective immediately, Pakistan and India will dismantle their nuclear armaments as they have not demonstrated the stability to have such destructive weaponry in their hands. Failure to do so will result in immediate action. North Korea will hand over to U.N. Authorities all materials on hand capable of assembling nuclear weaponry. Failure to do so will result in immediate action.Thank you for your attention.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Do Your Emotions Help You or Hold You Back?
Recently, a close friend of mine made the remark that our emotions for the most part are basic, primal, immature, and unevolved. Ever since then, I have been ruminating on the validity of this statement. If our emotions are basically primitive, then how they be our allies, especially on the path to

posted 10:52:25am Jan. 26, 2015 | read full post »

Powers of Mind: In Praise of Subtle Actions
At a time when the mass of headlines seem to be about the brain, artificial intelligence, robotics, and smarter computers, not enough is said about the mind. When reduced to a mechanism, the mind somehow is thought to turn into the brain, with no difference between them. It's true that the brain see

posted 10:51:38am Jan. 19, 2015 | read full post »

Can Science and Religion Save Each Other? (Part 2)
Science is used to being dominant, and religion is used to being defensive--these are familiar poses for two worldviews, the one being on the rise, the other on the decline. Generally when an entire belief system is on the decline, it steadily disappears. There's no need to believe that the king's t

posted 10:29:24am Jan. 12, 2015 | read full post »

Can Science and Religion Save Each Other?
A flurry of controversy surrounded the astronomer Neil deGrasse Tyson two weeks ago when he took a jab at religion in the name of science. It began Christmas day with a mischievous tweet: “On this day long ago, a child was born who, by age 30, would transform the world. Happy Birthday Isaac Newton

posted 3:36:40pm Jan. 05, 2015 | read full post »

How to Save the World--A Simple Answer
Around a decade ago, when I first started posting at Huffington Post, one entry considered the world's four greatest problems. They were over-population, climate change, pandemic disease, and refugeeism. Despite the suffering and fear it creates, terrorism affects far fewer people than these four is

posted 10:11:57am Dec. 22, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.