Deepak Chopra and Intent

Deepak Chopra and Intent


Obama: Our plumber-in-chief

posted by dchopra

Although the Presidency is about issues, challenges, and complex negotiations, there’s another side. With every new President we get the pleasure of watching a human being adapt to the office. Very quickly an image emerges. Barack Obama entered the White House at a time of crisis, amid frayed nerves and anxiety. The image we wanted to see was pictured in advance by constant references to Lincoln and FDR, the two Presidents who overcame the deepest crises in our history.
Amid the dog show and the Easter egg roll, the whirlwind foreign visits and being the man who accompanied Michelle Obama to Europe (a wink-and-a-nod reference to JFK, another dapper celebrity politician), what do we feel about this new President as a human being?
Personally, Obama seems to me to be a man of virtue. This is something of an irony, because George W. Bush and the right wing co-opted virtue back in 2001. They trumpeted their desire to bring decency back to the White House after the shocking (how very shocked they were) immorality of Bill Clinton. As the party of “values,” the Republicans took out a patent on virtue, so it must be galling for them to witness in Obama someone who actually is decent, truthful, candid, and strong. The Bush smirk wasn’t the only giveaway that our last President wasn’t going to live up to his billing. He always seemed like an expensive suit wrapped around a show of qualities he didn’t possess. The private Bush was stubborn, capricious, sulky, and immature. He was born to privilege and the recklessness of privilege. He cried at the sight of wounded vets but couldn’t grasp the wrong of the unjust war he foisted upon them.
The country could afford to tolerate Bush’s shallowness when we felt rich and safe. but after the debacle of the Iraq war, the rising tide of hatred from the Islamic world, the abandonment of our traditional alliances, and finally the catastrophe of the financial collapse, we couldn’t afford someone who pretended to qualities he didn’t have.
Great leaders have an uncanny way of matching the need of the time. Obama isn’t a carbon copy of Lincoln and FDR. So far, he hasn’t displayed the former’s immense moral courage or the latter’s larger-than-life optimism. The particular virtues that are being called upon from this President are calmness, astuteness, and organization. Taken altogether, they aren’t a glamorous package. Obama ran for the office on inspiration, but he may wind up being remembered as the fix-it President. He’s the plumber-in-chief assigned to repair a hundred leaks that cannot be ignored any longer.
Still, it’s comforting to know that Obama can rise to inspiration if that’s what is needed. It’s also comforting to see that he is normal. His wife reminds him not to scare the kids when he growls too loud reading “Where the Wild Things Are.” He bowls a terrible game and becomes endearing for it. He makes clunky attempts to unbend from his natural dignity, and that endears him, too. Virtue was dragged into the White House eight years ago as a semi-sleazy political gambit. How amazing that when we least expected it, the real thing arrived.
Published in the San Francisco Chronicle
Deepak Chopra on Intent.com



Advertisement
Comments Post the First Comment »
post a comment

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

How Richard Dawkins Lost His Battle with God
When he wrote his 2006 best-seller, The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins expected to accomplish two aims that have proved to be remarkable failures. The first aim was social. He wanted to attract a horde of doubters, fence-sitters, and agnostics to gather their courage and join the atheist ranks. This

posted 11:50:49am Nov. 17, 2014 | read full post »

How to Make God Love You
Although the modern controversy over God centers on the famous headline from Time magazine, "Is God Dead?" this isn’t really the key question. By definition, God can't be dead, because "dead" implies that God was alive, and once alive, an immortal being can't die. Yet defining God as immortal or l

posted 11:05:23am Nov. 10, 2014 | read full post »

Why God Doesn't Care What You Do
In every religion that believes in a personal God, there's a connection between the divine and the human. A personal God created life, and he (or she) cherishes his creation. No love is more intense than divine love. No anger is more intense than divine wrath. As relationships go, the one with God p

posted 11:15:46am Nov. 03, 2014 | read full post »

"I am the master of my fate": A New Take on Free Will
Back when schoolchildren regularly read uplifting poetry, there was a famous Victorian poem that affirmed the human birthright of free will. It was "Invictus," by W. E. Henley and began: Out of the night that covers me, Black as the pit from pole to pole, I thank whatever gods may be For

posted 11:27:37am Oct. 27, 2014 | read full post »

Memo to Neuroscience: “We Are Not Brain Puppets”
The notion that human beings walk, talk, think, and do things because our brains control us is a fringe idea, easily refuted with a few moment’s thought and rarely taken seriously. But it got a boost from an Op-ed piece in the New York Times last week under the title, “Are We Really Conscious?

posted 2:29:43pm Oct. 20, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.