Bill Donohue’s Take on Hagee’s Apology

donahue.jpgThe case is closed on John Hagee, the Texas evangelist whose endorsement of John McCain set off a national controversy because of allegations that Hagee’s books and sermons contain anti-Catholic rhetoric. Or at least it’s closed according to Bill Donohue. The president of the conservative Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, Donohue led the campaign for McCain to distance himself from Hagee after the endorsement. After receiving a letter of apology and clarification from Hagee, Donohue today said the controversy is officially over. God-o-Meter caught up with Donohue by phone shortly after he made the announcement.
In your statement today, you said that Hagee’s apology was born of weeks of meetings with Catholic leaders. Do you have a window into what that process was like?
It’s been going on for weeks. A lot of Catholic activist friends of mine and some evangelicals have been powwowing with [Hagee] in Washington. They asked me to meet with Hagee and I said no several times. I’m not interested in meeting with him until I get what I want, a public statement and apology that’s complete and speaks specifically to these black legends about Catholics-Jewish relations, and the Holocaust in particular. And once that’s accomplished, I’ll be glad to meet with him. Now that’s going to happen on Thursday.
Quite frankly, I didn’t think that I would get something this complete. What I did not want to get was this “If you’ve been offended, I’m sorry.” I wanted something more specific. There’s no substitute for personal interaction, when you have people sitting down with you and explaining how you’ve been hurtful. Now we can bury this hatchet. It’s rather dramatic….
What really got me offended was the idea of “I’m the purist Christian on the block” when he’s talking to Jews—“I’m not out there persecuting the Jews like all these Catholics.” I’m sure we’ve seen the last of that.
Is Hagee acknowledging that he said anti-Catholic things, or only that he was insensitive toward Catholics and was careless about saying things that could be construed as anti-Catholic?
It’s very hard for me to deal with motive and intent. Is the person a real bigot? Unless the person admits to it, I don’t know. I’m not here to judge a pure heart.
What are you going to say to Hagee when you meet?
I want to sit down and talk to him. There’s not going to be any lectures. I got what I needed. I just want to shake his hand and thank him for doing this. I’m hoping now that people in our society who’ have looked on him as telling the truth about the Catholic church’s relations with Jews will hopefully reconsider….
There’s a residue of anti-Catholicism in part of the evangelical community and when you have the readiness of mind to believe the worst of any group, it becomes easier to swallow the moonshine, so to speak.
How far back does Hagee’s record of making anti-Catholic statements go?
I wrote to him in 1997 and he never wrote back. We had somebody from our chapter go to one of his events and he had some video that was casting aspersions (on Catholics) and he never answered me.
People like Tony Perkins and Richard Land and James Dobson, we obviously have theological differences, but there has always been comity and an amicable relationship. I get involved with them occasionally on policy things, like Justice Sunday, and Hagee is not only not invited, his name is not even mentioned. He’s kind of out of the loop.
Are you concerned that all of Hagee’s books and other writings about Catholics are still in circulation? Does he need to renounce all that?
If you were to come by my office, you would see hundreds upon hundreds of books by anti-Catholics—we have a huge library of them. You can’t do anything about his books.
The McCain campaign has caught a lot of grief over its Hagee endorsement. Has the campaign been in touch with you about resolving this issue?
The campaign has not been in touch with me, but intermediaries have been in touch back to the time when this happened.
I’m not a virgin. I understand where this is coming from. We’re in the middle of a presidential campaign. He took on enormous pressure because I went after him after he endorsed McCain. So there are all kinds of media now who had never heard of this guy and they’re not putting him in the spotlight. He got rapped all over the place. Could I have gotten this letter eleven years ago? No, he blew me off then.


Comments read comments(7)
post a comment

posted May 13, 2008 at 10:55 pm

Umm, have Catholics ever apologized for their stance that anyone not Catholic isn’t a Christian? Catholics have not one shred of proof of that from anything actually written by the Apostles or disciples, and nothing from any of the Gospels, and yet the “Catholic” position is firm on that incorrect and insulting position.
Any Catholics out there want to step up to the “I’m sorry” mic?

report abuse


posted May 14, 2008 at 10:13 am

Donny –
“Umm, have Catholics ever apologized for their stance that anyone not Catholic isn’t a Christian?”
Please cite your proof that Catholics teach or ever taught this.
I’ll help where to start looking: Canon Law, the Cathecism, ANY Encyclical
or any Church document ever written.
Good luck!

report abuse

BenYachov(Jim Scott 4th)

posted May 14, 2008 at 10:58 am

>>Umm, have Catholics ever apologized for their stance that anyone not Catholic isn’t a Christian?
>Please cite your proof that Catholics teach or ever taught this.
I reply: Catholics simply have never taught this. Sure technically Catholics believe Protestants are heretics(& vice versa) but the Council of Trent says their Baptisms are valid as long as they do it with water In the Name of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit.
Protestants are Christians. UnBiblical heterodox Christians from a Catholic perspective but Christians non the less.

report abuse


posted May 14, 2008 at 12:28 pm

It seems Donny needs to apologize for bearing false witness.

report abuse


posted May 14, 2008 at 5:40 pm

Isn’t this a really big issue between many religious traditions and even among the denominations within those traditions? Don’t lots of traditions and denominations look upon other ones as false or heretical, with not-so-pleasant consequences for adherents of those other traditions/denominations? In other words, aren’t their billions of beleivers who believe other purported believers are going to hell?

report abuse


posted May 15, 2008 at 8:55 pm

“Outside the Church there is no salvation.”
From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
One cannon charge with the sin of the separation those who at present are born into these communities…and in them are brought up in the faith of Christ, and the Catholic Church accepts them with respect and affection as brothers…All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church.
Furthermore, many elements of sanctification and of truth are found outside the visible confines of the Catholic Church.

Christ’s Spirit uses these Churches and ecclesial communities as means of salvation…
…All these blessings come from Christ and lead to him, and are in themselves calls to “Catholic unity.”

report abuse

Paul Shiras

posted May 19, 2008 at 12:48 pm

“But receive everyone who come in the Name of the Lord, and prove and know him afterward; for you shall have understanding right and left.”–The Didsache, Chapter 12-The Reception of Christians.
Maybe this needs to be posted on the doors of All Churches.

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

Closed for the Season
With Election Day finally having come and gone, God-o-Meter is closing up shop till 2012--or at least 2010. Till then, get your faith and politics fix over at Beliefnet editor-in-chief Steve Waldman's blog. 7 ...

posted 4:32:33pm Nov. 19, 2008 | read full post »

On The Religious Left, Great Expectations
The first priorities for Barack Obama's administration will be the economy and a variety of foreign policy issues. But the burgeoning religious left, which worked so hard to get Obama elected, expects some movement on its issues, including a ...

posted 1:49:31pm Nov. 07, 2008 | read full post »

Howard Dean's Vindication
God-o-Meter wrote a piece for today's Roll Call on the vindication of Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean's much-derided 50-State Strategy, which is largely about reaching out to the nation's more religious voters in the red ...

posted 2:01:06pm Nov. 06, 2008 | read full post »

A Post-Election Chat with Ralph Reed
Amid today's talk that Barack Obama has narrowed the God Gap, God-o-Meter checked in with Ralph Reed, who spearheaded religious outreach for George W. Bush's 2000 and 2004 campaigns and who pioneered such outreach for Republicans as executive ...

posted 3:09:07pm Nov. 05, 2008 | read full post »

More Innacurate Faith Storylines From the Media
God-o-Meter is struck by the number of faith-based storylines the news media appear to have gotten dead wrong this year. One was the line that Obama was poised to make big gains among white votes, especially evangelicals, who were undergoing a ...

posted 11:53:20am Nov. 05, 2008 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.