Advertisement

City of Brass

City of Brass

Iraq War retrospective: the liberal case for war #iraq10

The Threatening Storm by Kenneth Pollack

The Threatening Storm by Kenneth Pollack

The debate over the Iraq war was not polarized according to liberal/conservative fault lines, but stretched across them. In fact, many liberals found themselves reluctantly swayed by the arguments for war, especially after Kenneth Pollack’s book <a href="The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq“>The Threatening Storm was published in September 2002, roughly the one-year anniversary of 9-11 and 6 months prior to when the actual invasion began.

Advertisement

In a nutshell, liberals were convinced by fear over the threat of Saddam Hussein possessing WMDs – nuclear and chemical; as well as humanitarian concerns. Both of these issues are still relevant in the recent and ongoing debates about action towards North Korea, Iran, Syria and Libya.

Perhaps the most famous liberal who supported the war was Hillary Clinton, who as a newly-minted Senator voted for the Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) against Iraq in October of 2002 (and gave a speech about it). It is notable that she recanted her support for the war during the primary in 2008 while running against Barack Obama, and chose yesterday, the 10-year anniversary of the Iraq War, to publicly come out in favor of gay marriage.

Advertisement

Liberal bloggers were also misled by these arguments into supporting the war, for example writer Matthew Yglesias, who in 2010 distilled his error into 4 reasons. Another was Thomas Nephew, who is a friend of mine, who wrote a very lengthy piece entitled “with regrets, for war on Saddam” that is perhaps the best-argued case for war that existed at the time. This is one of the truly landmark pieces in the blogsphere, because it accurately maps out every facet of the debate in liberals’ minds, and is a must-read. Thomas has kindly given me permission to repost it in full here at City of Brass which I will do later today.

Advertisement

Like most of the liberals who supported the war, Thomas changed his assessment early on into the campaign when it became obvious that the existence of WMDs was a mirage, and chaos from the poorly-planned postwar management of Iraq spiraled out of control. And when the scandal of Abu Ghraib was revealed, the moral arguments that liberals needed to justify their support evaporated completely, leaving a skepticism and cynicism that still persists today – Thomas today is a fierce and principled critic of Barack Obama for domestic civil rights over-reach and the drone program.

Once again, the debate from late 2002 continues to have ramifications today. Far from being reflexively anti-Bush, or as warblogger Steven den Beste claimed, “wanting America to lose“, liberals were genuinely driven by patriotism and humanitarian concern for the muslims of Iraq under Saddam’s rule. The betrayal of that trust in authority, exemplified by Colin Powell’s presentation at the UN, has led to a deep-seated skepticism on the liberal left against Barack Obama’s policies. Liberals such as Glenn Greenwald are far more critical of Obama than they ever were of Bush, in part because of their experience a decade ago.

Previous Posts

Ramadan Pearls 05 - objective
As for the men of knowledge of the hereafter, what they mean by the correctness of fasting is its acceptability; and the acceptability of the fast is whether or not it has enabled one to reach one's objective. They understand the objective of ...

posted 7:26:32am Jul. 05, 2015 | read full post »

The Fourth and the First
This evening, just prior to sunrise, members of my mosque in Los Angeles gathered round to raise the flag of the United States of America. Due to fortuitous timing, just as the flag was unfurled, a squadron of planes flew overhead in formation, ...

posted 12:38:00am Jul. 05, 2015 | read full post »

Ramadan Pearls 04 - angels
He who has fasted for Allah, the Glorious and Mighty, and is in the discomfort of heat and struck by thirst, will have his face wiped and be given the good news by a thousand angels whom Allah has entrusted to him until he breaks his fast; at ...

posted 8:16:29am Jul. 03, 2015 | read full post »

ibadat in Ramadan - process as piety
There are a lot of articles written during Ramadan about what Ramadan means, about what we as Muslims should be "getting out" of Ramadan, what the benefits of Ramadan should be. But I think that these sorts of articles miss the point of ibadat. ...

posted 10:20:36am Jul. 02, 2015 | read full post »

Ramadan Pearls 03 - mystery
Know that the goal in fasting is for the veil of appetite and anger to be lifted from the heart's eye so that the heart may see the mystery of the dominion of heaven and earth. (The Easy Roads of Sayf al-Din, as translated by William Chittick ...

posted 8:57:01am Jul. 01, 2015 | read full post »

Advertisement


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.