City of Brass

City of Brass

Is Elena Kagan qualified for the Supreme Court?

posted by Aziz Poonawalla

I had a twitter debate with Pejman Yousefzadeh about Elena Kagan’s qualifications for Supreme Court Justice. I honestly don’t really have any strong preference, but found the question of qualifications to be highly subjective.
Here's our debate in chronological order, starting with my reply to a tweet where he called Kagan a "cipher" (Note that the indented tweets are Pejman, addressed to me):

@yousefzadeh not a cipher at all. See @lessig rebuttal to @ggreenwald:

@azizhp @lessig spends more time writing about @ggreenwald than he does writing about Kagan.

@azizhp We all know that Diane Wood would have been the more substantive candidate.

@yousefzadeh we “all” know? I think not. Was never strongly in one camp or other. “substantive” is subjective.

@azizhp Do you doubt that Wood has the more substantive record?

@yousefzadeh I dont know how to quantitatively compare them. I do know Kagan is as qualified as William Rehnquist was.

@azizhp You can qualitatively compare them by seeing which one has published more. As a sitting judge, Wood is the clear winner.

@azizhp Given that Wood teaches as well, she runs up the score.

@azizhp Rehnquist was a practicing attorney for 20 years before being nominated, including a Supreme Court clerkship . . .

@azizhp . . . 16 years of private practice, and time in the Justice Department. No way Kagan matches that.

@yousefzadeh these are all qualitative comparisons., which remain subjective. To my eye, Wood, Kagan, and Rehnquist are all equal.

@yousefzadeh Kagan clerked for Marshall on SCOTUS. Tenure at UChicago. Numerouus law review articles. And then Dean of Harvard Law.

@yousefzadeh you can argue that X, Y are not enough and there should be more of Z, but thats entirely arbitrary.

@yousefzadeh Neither Rehnquist nor Kagan has prior judicial experience. Kagan’s academic record is superior to Rehnquist but lagged Wood’s.

@azizhp Rehnquist was the class valedictorian from Stanford Law School. Where do you get the idea that Kagan’s academic record was better?

@azizhp And while neither had prior judicial experience, Rehnquist had more experience than does Kagan, especially as a practicing attorney.

@yousefzadeh Kagan had tenure, published law review articles, and beccame Dean. Agreed Rehnquist had more “field” experience. apple, orange

@azizhp She most certainly does not have numerous law review articles. Her publication record is exceedingly thin.

@azizhp Rehnquist clerked for Justice Robert Jackson, spent 16 years in private practice, and 2 years at the Justice Dept.

@azizhp There is no way that Kagan matches that. And there is no way that you can call this judgment “subjective” with a straight face.

@yousefzadeh Kagan published at least two law review articles – rehnquist zero. Rehnquist had more trial experience, not academic.

@azizhp Again, Kagan’s publication record is exceedingly thin. She had tenure at Chicago, but it wasn’t renewed when she tried to come back.

@azizhp And it is by no means “apple, orange” to say that Rehnquist had much more experience than does Kagan.

@azizhp These are facts. You are not entitled to an alternative set of them, merely because you don’t like how they make Kagan look.

@azizhp And by the way, I write this as someone who is glad Kagan got chosen instead of Wood. Wood would be a power player from the get-go.

@yousefzadeh there are no “alternative” facts here, we have the same data. you are weighting some data higher than others.

@yousefzadeh I weight the data about equally – academics, private practice, clerkships, tenure. Rehn. and Kagan have different profiles.

@yousefzadeh But its you arguing on alternative facts if you insist that your weighting is objective. Its arbitrary (not wrong)

@yousefzadeh I dont have any strong feeling on Wood vs Kagan. I liked what @lessig said though. I’m satisfied.

@azizhp You conveniently forget all of the other things Rehnquist published:

@azizhp So as we see, Rehnquist’s publication record far exceeded Kagan’s.

@azizhp And this despite the fact that Rehnquist only taught during summer courses, and in visiting capacity when the Court was in recess.

@yousefzadeh why are you ascribing bias to me? nice list. Rehnquist’s publication list SHOULD be longer than Kagan, he served from 1971 on

@yousefzadeh filter your list to pre- and post 1971 to get a feel for relative record/relevance to qualification for being nominated

@azizhp Wrong. Rehnquist had more experience, and more publications. He wins outright.

@azizhp We are talking not just about opinions, but about books as well. Rehnquist’s publication list exceeds Kagan’s.

@azizhp More publications, more experience, clerkship with the Supreme Court; all of this combines to make Rehnquist the superior candidate.


I don’t think we will agree for precisely the reason I argued above – the question of what makes a candidate qualified is an inherently subjective one. The relative weighting you assign to the data points (years in private practice, judicial experience, academic record, papers published, other writing, etc etc) is completely arbitrary – Pejman dismisses most of Kagan’s career and points to Rehnquists’ years in private practice and Wood’s status as a sitting judge as proof of superiority.

Note however that contrary to Pejman’s assertion, Kagan did indeed publish at least two law review articles, according to Wikipedia: “Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine,” and “Presidential Administration,” the latter earning honors from the American Bar Association.

Also, it’s obvious that Rehnquist has more publications – he had a longer career. The impressive list of publications that Pejman linked to should properly be filtered to a pre-1971 and post-1971 list to be of value in making a comparison between Kagan and Rehnquist based on publication history, as I tried to point out. Of course you could introduce yet another arbitrary weighting of books versus articles vs book reviews, etc and tweak the outcome either way again. As I said, it is arbitrary.

Pejman accuses me of bias but I don’t have any particular pro-Kagan interest, rather a data-centric one. I trust the professionals of law to evaluate their peers, and on that standard, Kagan’s record (tenure at UChicago, then Dean at Harvard, plus being Editor of Harvard’s Law Review) makes me biased in favor of the assumption she is qualified, a-priori. But I think there’s enough data beyond those two points to make sufficient case she is as qualified as anyone else, including Wood or Rehnquist (the latter whom I am not trying to impugn, though Pejman seems to suspect I have a partisan axe to grind here).

Ultimately, the best case for Kagan was made by Lawrence Lessig, in response to Glenn Greenwald‘s leftist critique of her. I guess it boils down to argument by authority. I just dont see an objective data set here. But that’s why Presidents pick Justices, instead of algorithms.

  • Saad

    Being tenured at Harvard is no longer considered a mark of anything.
    Alan Dershowitz, is a law professor at Harvard whose main accomplishments recently are claiming torture is needed, supporting Israel no matter what, debating Noam Chomski and losing, promoting a campaign to deny Finkelstein tenure, etc.
    Also Harvard admitted and graduated Bush Jr. who really knew nothing and was never worthy of a degree from Harvard. Harvard is also the nexus of so called MBA graduates who failed at running most financial institutions and had to be bailed out to the tune of hundreds of billion dollars.

  • pagansister

    Is she qualified? Yes. Very simple.

Previous Posts

is ISIS Islamic? Wrong question.
There is an excellent longform essay on ISIS published in The Atlantic, "What does ISIS Really Want?" that lays out an excellent case fore ISIS being genuinely different in ideology, motivation and ethos than Al Qaeda. The real question boils down to, is ISIS "Islamic" or not - and makes an excellen

posted 11:34:08pm Feb. 17, 2015 | read full post »

The Price of Extremism
This is a guest post by Durriya Badani. The execution style murder of three young North Carolina students, two of whom were hijab wearing Muslim women, raises questions regarding the rise of Islamaphobia in the United States in the form of hate crimes. Some will argue that the motive for the inc

posted 11:26:53am Feb. 12, 2015 | read full post »

Can atheism drive someone to murder? #muslimlivesmatter #chapelhillshooting
Like everyone else, I am in shock at the horrible tragedy in North Carolina last night, where three young Muslim Americans were brutally executed. The police are investigating and the murderer is in custody and cooperating. The family of the victims will hold a press conference soon, until then I am

posted 4:21:58pm Feb. 11, 2015 | read full post »

Halal Italian and Mexican catering in Chicago
This is a guest post by Whitney Gaspar. I am not Muslim. I am not any religion, really. I was baptized as a Catholic to please my grandma and raised as an atheist by my mother. I am spiritual and I believe in God. But that is not why I eat halal. I eat halal because it is logical. It simpl

posted 11:09:45am Feb. 09, 2015 | read full post »

the State of the Ummah, 2014/1436
I tuned into President Obama's 2014 SOTU for a while last week - mainly beca

posted 12:06:37pm Jan. 26, 2015 | read full post »

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.