Blogalogue

Blogalogue


Counterculture for the Common Good (D. Michael Lindsay)

posted by nsymmonds

I’ll begin by (again!) agreeing with Jeff: It’s good for democracy when a group of citizens become politically engaged. Debates are more robust, candidates have sharper visions, and civic participation rises. All of us agree that evangelicals now have power. But their legacy is still up for grabs. What does the future hold?
Power is still relatively new to evangelicals, and as people of the Book, they are in a tough spot when they want guidance.


Throughout most of the Bible, the faithful are not very powerful. But dozens of people I interviewed mentioned one passage that they found instructive. It’s taken from Jeremiah 29. Here the prophet tells the Jews how they ought to view their time in Babylon, where they had been taken into captivity by Nebuchadnezzar: “Seek the peace and the prosperity of the city to which [you have been carried]…because if it prospers, you too will prosper.”
This passage captures perfectly the tension of evangelicals in power. It offers a religious reason for seeking cultural influence, for they are commanded to leave their mark by working for peace and prosperity. And yet, the command is given to a group in exile, reminding them to hold lightly to whatever power they are able to garner along the way.
The powerful people I interviewed identify with the feeling of being in exile, which sounds strange. “How are you in exile?” I would ask. “Aren’t you sitting in the corner office? Didn’t your side win in the last election?” But many of these leaders grew up signing a hymn that says, “This world is not our home.” The sense of being a sojourner, even when running a Fortune 500 company, is embedded in their religious DNA.
This isn’t a refusal to acknowledge the power they have; it’s a skeptical attitude toward it. This vision of power held at arm’s length is what makes evangelicals different from the rest of the American elite. Otherwise, they will become just another privileged group, what Hanna aptly described as something akin to “the Politburo circa 1989.” Some evangelicals already act that way, but they don’t represent evangelicalism as a whole or its future.
Tim Keller pastors Redeemer Presbyterian Church in Manhattan, and he is the most popular preacher among the nation’s cosmopolitan evangelicals. Keller has urged fellow evangelicals to view themselves as part of a “counterculture” that resists the charms of the establishment. But he also urges them not to work for their sectarian interests, but rather for the “common good.”
If evangelicals end up merely using politics for sectarian aims, we will all be worse off. Their Gospel will be less attractive to non-Christians. Other religious groups will feel increasingly marginalized. Faith will be seen as another tool for manipulating the public. So history will have to be the judge of whether this has been merely the triumph of another interest group or if the evangelical ascendancy has contributed to a more enlightened democracy, where engaged citizens use their faith to serve the common good.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
Jim T

posted November 1, 2007 at 8:23 pm


Power corrupts. That passage from Jeremiah has nothing to do with power. It is about cooperation for the common good – the realization that we are all in this together regardless of our backgrounds or affiliations. “Whatever blesses one blesses all.” It is akin to the Golden Rule. If power is your motivation for doing good, you will ultimately be exposed as frauds. God alone is power, it belongs to no man or group, but rather is what created us all.



report abuse
 

Daniel Smoak

posted November 3, 2007 at 5:03 pm


I don’t think we are talking about [achieving] power as a motivation for doing good. On the contrary, isn’t the issue how people in places of power struggle with their faith (often being skeptical toward the very power they have), attempting to use their influence to help others know the Lord and/or improve society.
I am certain that some people rise to power by stepping on others along the way, but I get the sense of from Dr. Lindsay’s interviews that there is a group of people who recognize their position of influence as a gift,(as all good gifts are from God)and they struggle to be good stewards of the gift they they have been given. Maybe that is why they turn to the Scriptures (like Jeremiah)for wisdom.



report abuse
 

Jim T

posted November 7, 2007 at 3:53 am


I came across this quotation today that seems relevant to this entire blogalogue:
“The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in essence, is fascism – ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.”
-Franklin Roosevelt



report abuse
 

Jordan Johnson

posted November 17, 2007 at 12:38 am


Power? Since when is power given to evangelicals? Isn’t the US government that’s still in power. The government that insists on seperation of church and state and yet you see its flag flying over churches.



report abuse
 

Thomas G. Underwood

posted November 18, 2007 at 9:47 pm


The day that God is not the driving power of the people of this country is the day we can bendover and kiss out butts goodby.
drawkcab



report abuse
 

Carl B. LaKing

posted December 6, 2007 at 3:57 pm


I cannot consider Mormon’s Christian. Reasons: Christians are “follower of Christ” Mormons are followers of Joseph Smith. God’s Word says if you add to these Words you WILL have your place in a Lake of Fire (HELL) God will not send Followers of Christ to hell. Mormons added their book, J.W.’s have created and added their book and so on. Christian – NO! Can;t be if God’s Word is the basis for all faith’s.
Of course then you can add others also but I won’t do it here. When any group,no matter what the sign over the door to their building says, LIVE by and follow the Word of God they are “Christian” or a follower of Christ. If they add their own flair or dialogue; they cannot be Christian: in my humble, educated opinion.



report abuse
 

PurpleKU77

posted April 20, 2008 at 9:49 am


Well, we have seen what 30 years of concerted, right-wing GodSquad Republicanism have led us to: factionalism, the trampling of the Constitution, torture, endless war, etc. Is this really what “The Kingdom Of God” is supposed to be about? If it is, then call me an Atheist. At least, with atheism, people are responsible for themselves, and cannot point to a God for justification of wrong actions. With atheism, problems and solutions are worked for HERE, where they are needed, and not shuffled off to be “redeemed in heaven.” With atheism, people are not tortured for believing in the wrong thing, or executed for going to the wrong church.



report abuse
 

jili

posted March 18, 2010 at 12:45 pm


Welcome to our website: http://www.wowhotsale.com
The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan,prada,adidas, also including the jeans,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations. All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept paypal payment.,after the payment, can ship within short time.
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
We do wholesale and retail! All are extremely CHEAP, please visit: http://www.wowhotsale.com



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Blogalogue. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here is another blog you may also enjoy: Inspiration Report Happy Reading!!!

posted 9:34:57am Jul. 06, 2012 | read full post »

How Do We Tell A True Act of God From A False One?
Dear Michael: Thank you again for this exchange, Michael; I am grateful that you took the time to teach me with such patience and tolerance. In all honesty, I can't follow your subtle discussion of the relationship between natural laws and Divine Providence. The fault is mine. I think you are sayi

posted 3:46:50pm Nov. 17, 2008 | read full post »

Do You Wonder About the Source of Meaning?
Dear Heather, I really enjoy the way you conduct a path through our disagreements. You are tough, but open to differences. As we have agreed from the first, to achieve real disagreement is a long-term task; it takes a lot of brandies sipped slowly together (so to speak) to get past the misunderstan

posted 10:51:30am Nov. 14, 2008 | read full post »

What About Other Religions?
Dear Michael: Thank you so much for your candid and probing response; it is most illuminating. Before addressing your final question, I am going to risk characterizing your presentation of religious faith. Some of our readers, if not you yourself, may find this presumptuous; if so, I accept their c

posted 4:21:02pm Nov. 13, 2008 | read full post »

Faith Is Not Just Belief
Dear Heather: There are many aspects of popular Catholic faith that have sometimes shocked me and turned me away. Yet I well remember visiting the great Catholic shrine at Czestechowa, in Poland, where once almost a million people turned out for Pope John Paul II when he first pierced the Iron Curta

posted 3:48:33pm Nov. 12, 2008 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.