Belief Beat

Belief Beat


Why We Covered the May 21 Rapture (That Wasn’t?) & Will Cover October’s Judgment Day (That Isn’t?)

posted by Nicole Neroulias

In the days since the unrapturous Rapture, I’ve seen a lot of comments here and on other religion blogs asking why Harold Camping’s prophecy got so much coverage in the first place, alternately accusing the media of snarky schadenfreude or just bad news judgment.

Here’s a good response from Religion News Service’s daily roundup yesterday:

Outside the Camping crew, some suggest that the media should don sackcloth and ashes for its role in the Hypeapocalypse. It’s shameful and cruel to laugh at the beliefs of others, TNR said.

I agree that some stories bore cringe-worthy blends of snark and condescension; and that dashed hopes are, at bottom, sad. But the antidote to shoddy journalism is good journalism, not self-censorship.

The Camping Crowd spent hundreds of thousands on billboards and paraded around town squares nationwide, telling one and all that the Rapture was coming on May 21 (in part because of gains in gay rights) and that everyone outside their angelic band was going to hell. All on the word of an 89-year-old civil engineer with a Bible and an abacus.

In fact, a good case could be made that the May 21 stories should have been tougher. A California woman tried to slit her daughters’ throats on Friday because she feared the Tribulation was coming. A man killed himself in 1994 after another of Camping’s failed prophecies. Bank accounts have been drained, reputations ruined and families torn asunder. Point is, Camping’s ideas have human costs, and thus deserve fair but incisive coverage.

Meanwhile, given that Camping is still insisting that the May 21 Rapture has happened — just in a less-visible way than he predicted (unless you’re counting the Missouri tornado and other natural disasters, though that might just be a normal summer) — we can expect that he and his Family Radio ministry adherents will continue trying to convince the rest of us that Judgment Day remains slated for Oct. 21. So, stay tuned (or prepare to ignore) more coverage this fall.

P.S. For what it’s worth, barring any major new developments, I’ll stop covering this now — as is my policy with the Westboro Baptist Church’s attention-seeking antics.

What do you think? Share your thoughts in the Comments section below.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
nnmns

posted May 24, 2011 at 2:45 pm


I think you make good points. And what if it had not been covered and the world had ended? The last thoughts of a lot of newspeople would have been of missed opportunity. Of course a lot of people’s last thoughts are probably of missed opportunities.

It will be interesting to see how many people bite come October.

I expect most of the backbiting about the coverage is people hoping the public in general never notices how far the Bible can lead people astray and hoping the public doesn’t realize they may be leading them astray based on the Bible.

I understand Harold Camping now says Jesus came the other day (invisibly) and judged us and decided we’d failed. And this arrival and this judgement was predicted in the Bible. So presumable Jesus came down with an open mind and based on the evidence chose to pull the plug on us in October. And that coming and that decision was pre-ordained in the Bible.

But if it’s pre-ordained in the Bible then Jesus’s hands were presumable tied; the “judgement” was pro-forma. Was this all a put-on by Jesus or did he come down not knowing how he’d decide? If it’s the first it’s tawdry behavior for a lord and savior. If the second it indicates Jesus doesn’t know his Bible.

Interesting.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted May 24, 2011 at 2:47 pm


Ok I see two things: I use “presumably” too often and I misspell it consistently. Today.

Darn.



report abuse
 

kenneth

posted May 24, 2011 at 4:10 pm


The antidote to shoddy journalism used to be …news judgment. Now that newsrooms and blogs are governed by reality show production value, the relevance of a story no longer matters, only its potential to create “buzz” and social media chatter. When I was in the news business not so very long ago, we sometimes covered lunatics, of course, but we didn’t give them 24/7 coverage for weeks and months at a time. I’m glad I got out when I did. The industry today, almost all of it, panders to freaks and misfits and fawns over them like royalty and produces nothing that can help people become intelligent citizens or consumers.



report abuse
 

MH

posted May 24, 2011 at 4:40 pm


I feel the coverage wasn’t nearly harsh enough.

Harold Camping strikes me as a typical televangelist con-man and not a nut with a sandwich board. He’s the president of Family Radio and possibly worth $122 million. But Family Radio was accepting donations last week. Now if you had that much money and really believed the world was ending, why bother accepting money?

Since his business is organized as a tax-exempt non-profit. The media should keep digging to see if it is acting like a tax exempt non-profit, or lining his pockets. The FCC should review his station licenses and see if he is acting within the license terms to act in the public good.

I have a mixture of sympathy and disdain for his followers. Sympathy that they were swindled and messed up their lives. I have particular sympathy for the children of his followers. I also feel disdain because they embraced an idea that all but 3% off humanity would die horribly.



report abuse
 

Robert C

posted May 26, 2011 at 9:51 am


The coverage was a pathetic testament to the rapid decline of professionalism, ethics and standards in contemporary journalism.



report abuse
 

MH

posted May 26, 2011 at 10:10 am


Robert C, it’s clear you didn’t like it, but what ethics and standards were violated? How would they need to change to fix things from your point of view?



report abuse
 

Nicole Neroulias

posted May 26, 2011 at 12:08 pm


To put another spin on your comment, Robert C: Perhaps the coverage was a “pathetic testament to the rapid decline of professionalism, ethics and standards in contemporary journalism” — due largely to the increase in public participation in the news process? Cash-strapped and understaffed mainstream news outlets have to dish out a lot more ice cream than broccoli these days, because they need to attract an audience that can go to hundreds of other sources for news, and would rather be reading about Lindsay Lohan over at TMZ. With Twitter, blogs and reader comments, you can see what stories drive traffic — and that drives coverage, for better or worse.

You can still blame the messenger, of course. But, as with the Koran burning and Westboro Baptist Church antics (which I and other journalists try not to publicize anymore), public interest plays a big role in what gets covered in America nowadays — and if the mainstream news outlets don’t cover it, these stories still get covered plenty (with less context and more bias) on the cable shows, blogosphere, Twitter, YouTube, etc.



report abuse
 

Robert C

posted May 26, 2011 at 8:52 pm


Because its “popular” doesn’t make it remarkable journalism. Mass appeal lines the media moguls pockets but does nothing to raise the level of that appeal. A Hoodsie is a far cry from hand churned gelato, even without broccoli anywhere in the building. The old saying says “you are what you eat”. That is true in more ways than one.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!
Thank you for visiting Belief Beat. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy:   Beliefnet News   Good News Happy Reading!  

posted 4:57:28pm Feb. 14, 2012 | read full post »

Fun Friday: Atheist Temple Planned for UK's Nonbelievers
Author Alain de Botton has announced plans to build an Atheist temple in the United Kingdom, presumably so nonbelievers have a place to gather and share their philosophies. Um... isn't that what Starbucks is for? Also, I can't wait to see how the architect will handle this kind of project. May

posted 2:53:42pm Jan. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Alaska Airlines: High Payers No Longer Offered Sky Prayers
Alaska Airlines, now the country's seventh-largest airline, has announced it will stop offering prayer cards with its in-flight meals. (It's just raining religion news in the great unchurched Pacific Northwest lately.) I've flown Alaska several times since moving to Seattle, but I confess that I'

posted 11:07:56am Jan. 26, 2012 | read full post »

Washington's Gay Marriage Debate: Clergy vs. Clergy
I reported for Reuters at the Washington state Capitol yesterday, covering the public hearings on a gay marriage bill -- and in between, the breaking news that the state Senate now has enough votes to pass the bill. (The House already had enough votes.) It now appears that Washington's lawmakers wi

posted 11:24:39am Jan. 24, 2012 | read full post »

What Israel's Domestic Policy & Santorum Supporters Have in Common
Hope everyone had an introspective Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day, whether observed as a faith-related holiday, a nice break from the work week or something else entirely. Check out this story from Religion & Ethics Newsweekly about how mandatory sentencing for drug crimes and non-violent offens

posted 1:32:44pm Jan. 18, 2012 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.