Belief Beat

Belief Beat


Terror Suspect Thwarted at Oregon Tree Lighting; Muslims Fear Backlash

posted by Nicole Neroulias

I’ll always remember Thanksgiving 2008 as the one where we carved the turkey to the sounds of CNN, anxious for updates on the attacks on Mumbai’s hotels, train station, cafes and Chabad House. Fortunately, this year’s holiday weekend remained terror-free, thanks to federal investigators who caught Mohamed Osman Mohamud, a “confused” Somali American teenager accused of plotting to bomb a Christmas-tree lighting ceremony in Portland, Ore.

It’s good news — except that now Muslim Americans are even more vulnerable to backlash. Here in the Pacific Northwest, there have already been several local stories noting that our Somali community is on high alert. Many fear there may be attacks on their mosques, like the fire set at the Islamic center Mohamud had attended.

What do you think? Share your thoughts in the Comments section below.

P.S. In the true spirit of the holiday, here’s the text of President Obama’s Thanksgiving proclamation and a New York Times story about an interfaith Thanksgiving service in suburban New York, my old neck of the woods.

*Click here to subscribe to Belief Beat and click here to follow Belief Beat on Twitter.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(14)
post a comment
nnmns

posted November 29, 2010 at 9:40 am


I understand he was pointed out to authorities by a U.S. Muslim because he was going radical. Like as not it was someone in that congregation. Then some idiot thanks them by trying to burn their building down. We need the good will of our Muslim citizens but the Fox News/Republican Party radicals jeopardize that to incite fear to win an election. And it worked. We may be too dumb to stay a free country long term.
On a related note, from Glenn Greenwald’s column, which is worth reading on this, Mohamud said to the FBI:

Undercover FBI Agent: You know there’s gonna be a lot of children there?

Mohamud: Yeah, I know, that’s what I’m looking for.

Undercover FBI Agent: For kids?

Mohamud: No, just for, in general a huge mass that will, like for them you know to be attacked in their own element with their families celebrating the holidays. And then for later to be saying, this was them for you to refrain from killing our children, women . . . . so when they hear all these families were killed in such a city, they’ll say you know what your actions, you know they will stop, you know. And it’s not fair that they should do that to people and not feeling it.

The point being that Mohamud sees himself responding to the US attacks which have, in fact, killed thousands of innocent Muslims in the oil lands and Pakistan and Afghanistan.
The longer we have troops fighting over there, and the longer Israel is using our weapons to kill Palestinians, the more people will be disposed to attack us this way and the more likely some will succeed.



report abuse
 

Jemima Boucher

posted November 29, 2010 at 9:53 am

BJ

posted November 29, 2010 at 11:07 am


Let me get this straight. One of their own plans an elaborate death trap, is caught and they are worried. What’s the first thing they are worried about? Not the hundreds of families who were targeted. Oh no. They’re worried first that the subhuman beast was ‘lured into it’. And then they’re worried that there could be retribution. If the so-called ‘moderate Muslims’ of the world would make a stand—a REAL stand, not the half-assed mumbling they do now—against terrorism, perhaps we can talk. Until then, they are part of the problem. I’m sick of them and their worrying that the big bad US is going to do them wrong.



report abuse
 

Robert C

posted November 29, 2010 at 1:25 pm


Ah. Let me see nnmns, the Fox News web site has a piece up on this topic which is an AP release. Which Fox news misrepresentation were you referring to, or are you just stabbing in the wind again? If they are suffering backlash in Portland, one of the most ‘liberal’ states, be relieved that this didn’t happen in Texas ( I am sure you would have the usual fun in labeling that reaction if that were so ).
Also while your counting the dead in muslim countries by our hand, try also keeping a historical tab on the dead incured by Islamic actions, although I am sure that such tabulations can become tedious. So now if I get this right, you believe that all American support of our allies should cease simply to prevent others from intimidating us through terrorism? Really? I daresay you’ve concotted a potential recipe for imminent international blackmail and increased threats. Label that one the Betty Crocker Terroist Cookbook. But you are right that we need the active participation of all American muslims in their civil duty to protect the commonwealth, and we need to insure their collective safety in turn.



report abuse
 

Jester

posted November 29, 2010 at 1:46 pm


The point being that Mohamud sees himself responding to the US attacks which have, in fact, killed thousands of innocent Muslims in the oil lands and Pakistan and Afghanistan.
So it’s our own fault that we’re being attacked by Muslims? What’s the long-term solution to this, nnmns?



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted November 29, 2010 at 3:17 pm


Long term, get our soldiers back here or where they are welcome. Historically, empires have not lasted and some have had bad ends. We are spending money we don’t have fighting in countries that aren’t threats to us and upholding some “friends” who do nothing for us but harm.
And try to comfort people like BJ in their terror. Such fearful bigotry does us no good.



report abuse
 

kaath

posted November 29, 2010 at 3:25 pm


Jester, is it so hard to understand that, yes, our actions in the world do have consequences? Frightened and angry people sometimes retaliate, just as the person who tried to burn down the would-be terrorist’s mosque retaliated. The problem is, whether you’re talking about terrorists reacting to what terrifies them by retaliating against innocent Americans and Europeans, or a firebomber retaliating against innocent American Muslims, it’s the knee-jerk “need” to retaliate at all that perpetuates the problem.
And BJ, I’m part of an interfaith group, so I see the concerted effort the international Muslim community has made (letter-writing campaigns, peace conferences, joint resolutions, advertising campaigns, public outreach etc.) to take a stand against extremism. You don’t see it or hear it because, to a large extent, the media are not reporting it. Right after 9/11 moderate Muslim clergymen gathered 5000 strong for a peace conference in New York. Only the BBC covered it, which means you’d only have heard about it if you tuned into NPR and listened to the BBC news. The Muslim community isn’t mumbling– we’ve just got our prejudices turned up too loud.
Peace doesn’t sell newspapers, I guess, or get you as many “eyeballs” as violence and controversy.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted November 29, 2010 at 3:34 pm


To add detail, our soldiers should be here or where they are welcome unless they are needed to fight a war that we need to fight. We never needed to invade Iraq and it’s cost us dearly. I was in favor of attacking Afghanistan, and we might possibly have quickly caught or killed Osama except Bush pulled our forces out to invade Iraq and Osama got away from Tora Bora.
Afghanistan isn’t much of a threat to us except as our missiles kill civilians and make us hated. And it looks a lot more like a bog than a chance for a victory. And it’s costing an arm and a leg; well, lots of arms and legs and eyes and lives. We need to declare victory and leave.
And then there are those who want us to make the supremely stupid mistake of attacking Iran, which is of no threat to us. A country that could be a threat to us is North Korea; it has nuclear weapons and could sell them to terrorists or one day even launch one at Hawaii at least. Iran can’t do those things and has enemies around it that should take care of themselves; we don’t need to do it and can’t afford to do it.



report abuse
 

SalemCat

posted November 29, 2010 at 6:47 pm


BACKLASH ?
Since when has any American Muslim suffered from Backlash !?
More innocent Muslims died in the Twin Towers on 9/11 than have from any “Backlash.”



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted November 29, 2010 at 8:10 pm


I’m extremely glad the would be bomber didn’t succeed. I have a niece who is in college in Portland. It is possible she was in the crowd that was at the tree lighting. What a shame some idiot decided to set fire to that Mosque. That act alone might prevent another member of the Muslim community from turning in a radical.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted November 29, 2010 at 11:53 pm


I’m extremely glad too.



report abuse
 

Anan E. Maus

posted November 30, 2010 at 1:39 pm


Christ said, “in the world you will have trouble, but do not fear, because I have overcome the world.”
Terrorism and terrorists have no power outside of God’s control. If we spend our time in prayer, charity and Bible study, we will stay in God’s heart of protection. Endlessly worrying about every dire possibility is not our spiritual duty.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted November 30, 2010 at 8:54 pm


Somehow Anan E.M., I don’t think my spending time in prayer,charity and Bible study would stop the would be bomber/terrorist. I prefer to let the autiorities do that. Sorry, I’m not putting my trust in any divine being to protect me or my family and friends. If it works for you, go for it. I’ll stick to reality.



report abuse
 

slobo

posted December 26, 2010 at 10:12 pm


It is time muslims fear…rightly so…



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!
Thank you for visiting Belief Beat. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy:   Beliefnet News   Good News Happy Reading!  

posted 4:57:28pm Feb. 14, 2012 | read full post »

Fun Friday: Atheist Temple Planned for UK's Nonbelievers
Author Alain de Botton has announced plans to build an Atheist temple in the United Kingdom, presumably so nonbelievers have a place to gather and share their philosophies. Um... isn't that what Starbucks is for? Also, I can't wait to see how the architect will handle this kind of project. May

posted 2:53:42pm Jan. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Alaska Airlines: High Payers No Longer Offered Sky Prayers
Alaska Airlines, now the country's seventh-largest airline, has announced it will stop offering prayer cards with its in-flight meals. (It's just raining religion news in the great unchurched Pacific Northwest lately.) I've flown Alaska several times since moving to Seattle, but I confess that I'

posted 11:07:56am Jan. 26, 2012 | read full post »

Washington's Gay Marriage Debate: Clergy vs. Clergy
I reported for Reuters at the Washington state Capitol yesterday, covering the public hearings on a gay marriage bill -- and in between, the breaking news that the state Senate now has enough votes to pass the bill. (The House already had enough votes.) It now appears that Washington's lawmakers wi

posted 11:24:39am Jan. 24, 2012 | read full post »

What Israel's Domestic Policy & Santorum Supporters Have in Common
Hope everyone had an introspective Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day, whether observed as a faith-related holiday, a nice break from the work week or something else entirely. Check out this story from Religion & Ethics Newsweekly about how mandatory sentencing for drug crimes and non-violent offens

posted 1:32:44pm Jan. 18, 2012 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.