Belief Beat

Belief Beat


Presbyterian Assembly Approves Gay Clergy, Not Gay Marriage

posted by Nicole Neroulias

Presbyterian leaders voted to allow gay clergy, but not gay marriage, during the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) General Assembly last week. But PBS’s Religion & Ethics Newsweekly reports that the measure now goes to the presbyteries, or local juriscdictions, which have previously rejected resolutions to ordain gays and lesbians.

The Associated Press reports:

Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is ranked the 10th-largest church in the U.S. with 2.8 million members, according to the National Council of Churches’ 2010 “Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches.” The church’s media materials tout 2.1 million members.

Under current church policy, Presbyterians are eligible to become clergy, deacons or elders only if they are married or celibate. The new policy would strike references to sexuality altogether in favor of candidates committed to “joyful submission to worship of Christ.”

Several major Christian denominations have voted in recent years to allow non-celibate gays to serve as clergy if they are in committed relationships. Among them are the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), the U.S. Episcopal Church and the United Church of Christ. Fewer major U.S. denominations have taken the step of fully endorsing gay marriage. Only two, the United Church of Christ and the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations, have explicitly allowed it.

The General Assembly meets every two years; gay marriage supporters must wait until then to try again.

P.S. For what it’s worth, GetReligion found coverage of this gathering to be “B.O.R.I.N.G.”

Share your thoughts in the Comments section below.

*Click here to subscribe to Belief Beat and click here to follow Belief Beat on Twitter.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(12)
post a comment
jestrfyl

posted July 12, 2010 at 2:23 pm


What? How can this be? A denominational meeting for business and polity discussions is boring? Only be definition and purpose are denominational meetings “boring”. If they weren;t boring, everyone would want to go, clamor to go, manipulate or connive to go. This way they are kept managable and easy to endure.
Who else but a denominational gathering can make hundreds of people focused on sex boring.



report abuse
 

Robert I. Eachus

posted July 12, 2010 at 4:20 pm


As a Presbyterian Elder involved to some extent in church polity, this is a misleading summary of what occurred. First, proposals approved by the General Assembly have to be approved by a majority of the Presbyteries. (That’s part of what it means to be Presbyterian.)
Second, the debate on ordination is not about who should be ordained. The arguments over the wording are about who can choose to ordain a minister (the Presbytery) or an Elder or Deacon (the local churches). The wide majority of opinion in PC(USA) is that the issue was settled a long time ago. (And a lot of people like me feel that the church leadership should stop trying to tinker with the wording, and go back to the wording of forty years ago, which worked just fine.
I, and most if not all Presbyterians believe in a personal relationship with God. If God tells you to repent and you don’t? That is a bar to ordination. That is the only issue here. Does God give different directions to different people? Sure, I could write a dozen, or a hundred sermons on cases where that happened in the Bible. Can the Presbytery or the Session decide that the voice you hear is not God? Happens on occasion, but trying to write a rule that applies to all cases is IMHO a foolish effort.
Maybe the right way to say it is that when a Presbytery or Session is considering whether to ordain someone, which matters least? God, the Bible, or the Book of Order? The Book of Order determines the agenda of a Session meeting, how minutes are kept, and whether certain motions require a second. But in Session meetings I have attended, the Bible gets a lot more attention when debating spiritual issues.
This latest wording will be considered by the Presbyteries. It may or may not get adopted. But it will have little, if any, effect on who is ordained.
Oh, in case you haven’t figured it out, when considering ordinations, I have paid attention to whether the candidate is living an exemplary life. I’ve never asked if a candidate was gay, or if they wen’t bar hopping on Saturday nights, or even if they are a Yankees fan.



report abuse
 

Greling

posted July 13, 2010 at 11:03 am


So, as it stands, gays can commence and bless weddings in PCUSA, but can’t get them themselves. Such a noble way remind them how second-class they are in the eyes of an all-loving God. Praise to those who stood up for LGBT clergy and shames on those who feel LGBT people are not worthy enough to be able to love as truly as others in PCUSA do.



report abuse
 

Joe Mustich, JP

posted July 13, 2010 at 7:18 pm


As justices of the peace, we perform non-religious civil marriage ceremonies all the time in CT, where we legalized civil unions in 2005 and marriage equality in 2008.
So kudos to CT and its citizens for supporting civil marriage. And lets not forget that marriage licenses are issued by and recorded in town halls, not church halls, mosques, temples etc….
Onward, Joe Mustich & Ken Cornet, Justices of the Peace,
Washington, Connecticut, USA.



report abuse
 

interpreter

posted July 14, 2010 at 12:53 pm


What’s wrong with the Presbyterians and Episcopalians? Don’t they know that the more liberal a Church becomes, the more members it loses?. Most Christians want a Church that preserves core values.



report abuse
 

gen

posted September 7, 2010 at 5:37 pm


Why do we even need to discuss the ordinance of gay clergy? The words gay and clergy dont even belong in the same sentence. God’s perfect helper for Adam was a woman, Eve. God didn’t see it fit to create a man to be Adam’s helper/partner. He created instead a woman, FEMALE. Does the Church not see this?



report abuse
 

Pingback: Presbyterians, U.S. Navy Tackle Gay Acceptance — Upsetting Some Christians - Belief Beat

Maury Kennerly

posted June 13, 2011 at 2:27 pm


THE BIBLE SPEAKS VERY CLEARLY ABOUT HOW GOD FEELS ABOUT SEXUAL SINS. WE SHOULD NOT DISRESPECT OUR HEAVENLY FATHER. READ MY BOOK CRUCIFIXION OF THE WORD. JESUS SAYS OUR BODIES ARE NOT MEANT FOR SEXUAL SINS. HOMO-SEX-UALITY. COME ON YOU KNOW THATS WRONG



report abuse
 

Mildred Maury Kennerly

posted June 23, 2011 at 12:47 pm


I am giving free e-books away to show exactly how God feels about all sex sins.



report abuse
 

Mildred Reese

posted July 17, 2011 at 4:57 pm


A person who is acting out a behavior that God calls an abomination should not preach the Word, because itis evident they don’t know it



report abuse
 

mildred kennerly

posted December 19, 2011 at 3:40 pm


how on earth can there be religious clergy who are teaching lies. false clergy teach falsehoods. read crucifixion of the word, by maury kennerly, and you will hear the truth.



report abuse
 

maury kennerly

posted January 30, 2012 at 5:09 pm


which is worse. Gay clergy are stepping on God like a door mat. you are the ones (clergy) who should know you are like a dog who has returned to his vomit.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!
Thank you for visiting Belief Beat. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy:   Beliefnet News   Good News Happy Reading!  

posted 4:57:28pm Feb. 14, 2012 | read full post »

Fun Friday: Atheist Temple Planned for UK's Nonbelievers
Author Alain de Botton has announced plans to build an Atheist temple in the United Kingdom, presumably so nonbelievers have a place to gather and share their philosophies. Um... isn't that what Starbucks is for? Also, I can't wait to see how the architect will handle this kind of project. May

posted 2:53:42pm Jan. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Alaska Airlines: High Payers No Longer Offered Sky Prayers
Alaska Airlines, now the country's seventh-largest airline, has announced it will stop offering prayer cards with its in-flight meals. (It's just raining religion news in the great unchurched Pacific Northwest lately.) I've flown Alaska several times since moving to Seattle, but I confess that I'

posted 11:07:56am Jan. 26, 2012 | read full post »

Washington's Gay Marriage Debate: Clergy vs. Clergy
I reported for Reuters at the Washington state Capitol yesterday, covering the public hearings on a gay marriage bill -- and in between, the breaking news that the state Senate now has enough votes to pass the bill. (The House already had enough votes.) It now appears that Washington's lawmakers wi

posted 11:24:39am Jan. 24, 2012 | read full post »

What Israel's Domestic Policy & Santorum Supporters Have in Common
Hope everyone had an introspective Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day, whether observed as a faith-related holiday, a nice break from the work week or something else entirely. Check out this story from Religion & Ethics Newsweekly about how mandatory sentencing for drug crimes and non-violent offens

posted 1:32:44pm Jan. 18, 2012 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.