At the Intersection of Faith and Culture

At the Intersection of Faith and Culture


Western Delusions and the death of bin Laden

posted by Jack Kerwick

A few weeks ago, President Obama informed us that Osama bin Laden, the internationally recognized founder of Al Qaeda who will be forever associated in our collective consciousness with the terrorist attacks of 9/11, had been killed in a clash with American troops. 

The news was greeted by a chorus of cheers and tears from crowds throughout the country.

Unfortunately, while there are few people as richly deserving of death as bin Laden, I partake of none of the jubilance that has enraptured my fellow countrymen and women. 

Let me be blunt: contrary to what many now seem to believe, the killing of bin Laden is anything but a game changer in favor of the United States.  Symbolically, it is a huge victory for our country, to be sure.  But substantively speaking, in reality, it is actually a potential loss. 

As usual, and in spite of all of our railing against the evils of “ethnocentrism,” we in the West refuse to come to terms with the stone cold fact that the Islamic perspective on the world and our own are not only mutually distinct, but mutually antagonistic.  Make no mistakes about it: the killing of bin Laden is most certainly not being viewed as a setback for his numerous disciples and comrades both within Al Qaeda and beyond.

For well over a decade, for the sake of Allah and in the same courageous spirit of the Prophet, bin Laden has devoted every quantum of his energy to combating the Mother of all infidels, the Great Satan herself, the United States.  Now, after all of this time, the most powerful agent of evil in our planet’s history has finally—finally!—slain him. 

At this moment, less than 24 hours after news of his death erupted, this is the narrative regarding bin Laden’s fate that is already well on its way to ensconcing itself in the minds and hearts of Muslims the world over.  To be certain, this ever evasive terrorist is unimaginably more of a danger in death than he ever was in life.  During his time on Earth, Muslims viewed bin Laden’s as the face of Islamic resistance to Allah’s enemies.  Now, his persona will emblematize the highest martyrdom.  

Observing the reaction to this event, it is hard to escape the sense that I have been hurled into an alternative reality of a sort.  The very same motley crew of leftists in Washington and the media who continually decried as “imperialist,” “immoral” and “illegal” our previous president’s efforts to prosecute “the War on Terror” are now as giddy as schoolgirls.  Even mobs of college students—characteristically the most outspoken agents of “imperialism,” “intolerance,” and “militarism”—have suddenly become unabashed jingoists as they feverishly chant “USA!” from the rooftops (they can’t all be Young Republicans, can they?). 

Particularly ironic is that those leftists who complained that President Bush’s foreign policy prescriptions were actually instruments for recruiting more terrorists fail to see that even our (admittedly foolish) military engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan will not prove as alluring to aspiring jihadists as the killing of Osama Bin Laden for which President Obama is now taking credit. 

In fact, few people on either side of the political divide appear to grasp this. 

If ever we needed proof that Obama is not a Muslim, his remarks concerning the killing of bin Laden is it, for no one remotely familiar with the nature of the Islamic psyche could for a second seriously entertain the thought that bin Laden’s death signifies a weakened Al Qaeda or even the slightest advance in the “War on Terror” (or whatever we’re calling it these days).  And this is the point: nearly ten years after 9/11 those in both of our national political parties remain in willful ignorance of the painful fact that, President Obama’s contention to the contrary notwithstanding, we most definitely are at war with Islam.  This isn’t to say that we are at war with all Muslims; but those with whom our conflict consists are most definitely not aberrations from an otherwise dovish religion. Rather, they are acting in accordance with a literal, not radical or extremist, reading of their faith.   

Osama bin Laden did not highjack an otherwise peaceful religion, and he is not a proponent of “radical Islam” or “Islamism”; these are categories that Westerners created in order to avoid the reality that bin Laden is an orthodox or traditional Muslim.  And his legions of followers are no different in this respect.  As such, they will be no more deterred by his death than the first Christians were deterred by the crucifixion of Christ.  In fact, just as the early Christians were actually inspired by both the passion of their Lord as well as the example of martyrdom set by other Christians, so bin Laden’s disciples will be inspired and emboldened by his example. 

Considering the corruption that the Christian mind has suffered in our secular, materialist age, it is not surprising that the religious conviction of a bin Laden should be foreign to contemporary Westerners.  Yet the sooner we grasp that, unlike our twentieth century conflicts, the present conflict is fundamentally religious in character, and unlike that of our previous enemies, the motivation of bin Laden and company is theologically-centered, the sooner we may recognize that as long as Islam remains with us, so too will the violence that attends it.

Jack Kerwick, Ph.D.



  • http://yallafinance.com/ yallafinance

    ANOTHER BLOW TO GADDAFI REGIME: OIL MINISTER DEFECTS-Libya is a country which is rich in oil.Defections from the government led by Muammar Gaddafi is the main reason why Libya is in a hard situation by now.

Previous Posts

Losing the Language: How the GOP Undermines Itself--and Liberty
As the mid-term elections approach, it’s high time for Republican commentators to walk the walk. Just the other morning, Mark Steyn, busily promoting his new book, made an appearance on Bill Bennett’s radio program. The latter agreed enthusiastically with the former that in order for conserva

posted 10:16:04pm Oct. 23, 2014 | read full post »

Political Correctness and Ebola
That there is a sensationalistic dimension to the Ebola coverage is something of which I have no doubt. Sensationalizing events is what the media does best. There may even be a sense in which it can be said that sensationalism is intrinsic to mass media.  Sensationalism serves the interests of t

posted 10:26:30pm Oct. 16, 2014 | read full post »

Capital Punishment Revisited
For a discussion of capital punishment, with no thinker is there a better place to begin than Ernest van den Haag. It is with justice that the latter’s seminal analysis of this topic is a staple of textbooks in college ethics courses nationwide: the author addresses the thicket of issues that are

posted 9:11:40am Oct. 14, 2014 | read full post »

Abortion Reconsidered III
Dan Marquis contends that except in “rare cases,” abortion is immoral, and it is immoral, he further argues, because the fetus has a “FLO”—a “future like ours.” Before arguing that abortion is wrong, Marquis first attempts to show what makes killing in general wrong. Killing is wron

posted 6:30:13pm Oct. 12, 2014 | read full post »

The Left, Columbus, and Why This Day is Still Worth Celebrating
Few holidays are as “politically incorrect” as is the day that Americans reserve to commemorate the birthday of Christopher Columbus. Such is the ferocity of the smear campaign to which Columbus has been subjected for decades that he has been made into a villain among villains in the rogues’ g

posted 6:11:01pm Oct. 12, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.