What do you believe?
Sign in to Add Your Post
KathyHL
5/7/2003 1:11:00 PM
Why don't the leaders of the Religious Right ask Bush a few questions about Robin Lowman Garner?
KathyHL
5/7/2003 12:40:33 PM
It's just more of Bush's whoring for votes with the Religious Right.
lucilius
5/5/2003 1:02:46 PM
On the Roman Empire, you'll note that I didn't say the non-Christian emperors had great morals - just that the empire was far more powerful (and thus further from dissolution) when predominantly pagan. But even most Christians would have a hard time faulting the morals of Antoninus Pius, who unlike the "Christian" Constantine the Great never had his sons killed; and unlike the devout Christian Theodosius the Great, never ordered the massacre of a city's population for jeering his representatives.
lucilius
5/5/2003 12:59:17 PM
It never ceases to amaze me how some people can make final-sounding pronouncements with no basis in fact.

About half of the states had some form of public education at independence, but there was no national public school system until the 1890s.

Many of the first schools in the U.S. were created by churches - so it's not surprising they had strong religious content.

As part of the colonial cultural context, it's hardly surprising that the Bible was used as a schoolbook: they didn't have much else.

But it's now a very different country, isn't it? We're no longer talking about a population that consists largely of religious refugees, of a limited number of Christian denominations.
singram684
5/5/2003 11:51:35 AM
It never ceases to amaze me how intelligent (and unintelligent) people can focus on one or two items from a "historical situation" and bend it to support their views.

Regarding the Roman Empire and its Fall, I think you have failed to look at the decadent slide of the empire prior to its "Christian Emperors."

As to the separation of Church and State etc. Let's look at the context of where the founding fathers were trying to go (ie away from their past). They did not want a king. They did not want a national religion (ie denomination). Both these things existed in the countries that our fore fathers fled. That is why they focused on our unalienable right to freedom so that the "Government" couldn't tell us what we had to or couldn't say.

By the way, for the first 150 or so years, religion was a required subject in our public schools if they wanted government funding.
lucilius
5/5/2003 11:21:37 AM
And ya know what? While the empire was pagan, it was at the height of its power. As Christianity advanced, the empire weakened; so by the time of its fall, non-Christian Romans were few and far between. The first Christian emperor ruled more than a century and a half before, and for about 100 years, Christianity was the empire's official religion. See how much good it did them?

Augustine wrote his "City of God" primarily to refute the popular opinion that it was the weakness and confusion engendered by Christianity that caused the empire's disintegration. He didn't do a very convincing job in my opinion.
lucilius
5/5/2003 11:21:24 AM
Pjj316: Better buy a history book. And not one of those hilarious home-school fundie versions either.

There was no "Greco-Roman republic." There were Greek city-states which associated in various leagues, Hellenistic (post-Alexander) kingdoms, the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire, in roughly that order.

The one we remember best and tend to associate with ourselves is the Roman Empire, the western half of which collapsed in the late 5th century. The eastern half held out for another thousand years, its capital finally falling to the Turks in 1453 - but the event we look back on as the "fall of Rome" was the end of the western imperial line in 476.
pjj316
5/3/2003 7:09:34 AM
USA better stand under God before it disintegrates into History like the Greco-Roman rupublic.
KathyHL
5/2/2003 12:49:13 PM
arammell,

I support your right to practice any religion you choose, AND your right to talk about it freely to anybody at any time - UNLESS you are in a government-funded situation, such as a meeting of a county board of supervisors, or the U.S. legislature. Even in those situations, I support your right to talk about religion in a historical sense or about your personal experiences. I'm just against things like group prayers or Bible studies supported by tax money.

Let me ask you this: if a religion other than yours was the dominant religion in this country, how would you feel about displays of religion in taxpayer-funded situations?
KathyHL
5/2/2003 12:44:27 PM
Tyler 7 said,

"But seriuosly, I am in a Missouri Junior High. I just don't say it."

Good for you! Personally, I refuse to lie to myself. And for me to say, "one nation under God," would be a lie, since I believe in the separation of church and state.
Tyler7
5/1/2003 4:41:46 PM
Well, "The under God" thing was put in with the help of the knights of columbus and Sen. McCarthy.
Since you support him, I will too.
And the first act is calling you a communist.
But seriuosly, I am in a Missouri Junior High. I just don't say it.
Tyler7
5/1/2003 4:36:18 PM
No. Many were Deists.
Sign in to Add Your Post

More Messages:
1 2 Next »