C'mon, Get Real
Wednesday October 11, 2006
Idolatry as “Bad habits,” “addictions,” “kissing Torah scrolls”: Weren’t these the kind of things pulpit rabbis spoke about in the 1950s on Shabbat when they couldn’t think of anything else to talk about?
Both Rabbi Waxman and Rabbi Grossman fail to address the searing social and religious issues regarding idolatry and Torah today.
As I have written elsewhere, the issue of idolatry is at the center of what some have called the clash of civilizations. If we look back and remember the first time most of us heard about the Taliban, it was not on Sept. 12, 2001, but a few months before that, in March 2001, when they decided to blow up ancient statues of the Buddha, claiming that the images where idolatrous.
Truth be told, the greatest idolatry being perpetrated today is by those who have substituted finite religious text for an infinite God. The extreme elements within Islam and Christianity (and some religious Zionists in Israel) are currently unable to distinguish between God and God’s written word.
God’s fixed word has in some sense taken the place of God’s infinite being. Idolatry is when one confuses a partial truth for a whole truth, or when one makes a relative into an absolute. As the 18th-century thinker Moses Mendelssohn argued in his book, "Jerusalem," God gave Judaism an oral law in order to act as bulwark against the idolatry of text. What these groups fail to realize is the ultimate infinity of God’s being. The struggle each of us engages in every day is keeping that infinity present.
These radical elements of religion, especially in Islam, wish to engender an absolute rule over all of humanity, forcing all to obey their reading of sacred text. This tyranny has now moved beyond politics and is infecting culture.
Whether it's Muslim cab drivers in Minnesota who refuse to take passengers carrying liquor, or Muslims in Europe threatening to disrupt a Mozart opera that contains “heretical” ideas, a new wave of cultural absolutism has been unleashed on humanity.
What is most ironic is that it is those who are screaming against idolatry are its greatest practitioners. What is child sacrifice if not a suicide bomber?
In Judaism, the term for idolatry is avodah zarah, which literally means a strange worship of God. It does not mean a denial of God, but rather serving God in an abnormal way. In other words, although one's intention may have a grain of truth, the mode of practice is all wrong and confused.
What all idolaters have in common is that they are religiously intoxicated human beings. They want to become closer to God; unfortunately what they forget is that they, like all of us, will never truly know God.
Both Rabbi Waxman and Rabbi Grossman fail to address the searing social and religious issues regarding idolatry and Torah today.
As I have written elsewhere, the issue of idolatry is at the center of what some have called the clash of civilizations. If we look back and remember the first time most of us heard about the Taliban, it was not on Sept. 12, 2001, but a few months before that, in March 2001, when they decided to blow up ancient statues of the Buddha, claiming that the images where idolatrous.
Truth be told, the greatest idolatry being perpetrated today is by those who have substituted finite religious text for an infinite God. The extreme elements within Islam and Christianity (and some religious Zionists in Israel) are currently unable to distinguish between God and God’s written word.
God’s fixed word has in some sense taken the place of God’s infinite being. Idolatry is when one confuses a partial truth for a whole truth, or when one makes a relative into an absolute. As the 18th-century thinker Moses Mendelssohn argued in his book, "Jerusalem," God gave Judaism an oral law in order to act as bulwark against the idolatry of text. What these groups fail to realize is the ultimate infinity of God’s being. The struggle each of us engages in every day is keeping that infinity present.
These radical elements of religion, especially in Islam, wish to engender an absolute rule over all of humanity, forcing all to obey their reading of sacred text. This tyranny has now moved beyond politics and is infecting culture.
Whether it's Muslim cab drivers in Minnesota who refuse to take passengers carrying liquor, or Muslims in Europe threatening to disrupt a Mozart opera that contains “heretical” ideas, a new wave of cultural absolutism has been unleashed on humanity.
What is most ironic is that it is those who are screaming against idolatry are its greatest practitioners. What is child sacrifice if not a suicide bomber?
In Judaism, the term for idolatry is avodah zarah, which literally means a strange worship of God. It does not mean a denial of God, but rather serving God in an abnormal way. In other words, although one's intention may have a grain of truth, the mode of practice is all wrong and confused.
What all idolaters have in common is that they are religiously intoxicated human beings. They want to become closer to God; unfortunately what they forget is that they, like all of us, will never truly know God.


Add to Newsvine
Comments
YES MARIAN
Posted by: Patsy Powell | October 18, 2006 11:54 PM
"Shalom to all" is a world of difference to screaming (all caps) "In Christ". I can see why you were reported. I noticed in your original post that you used the reference of one finger pointing at someone, three coming back at self. The rest of the saying that goes with that is "you spot it, you got it." I do study Torah and not from the King James version (which I do not have). Frankly, I enjoy most theological discussions with people who are not trying to ram and or force-feed their beliefs down my throat; I do get very stiff-necked at that point. Selfishly, because of being in an area with very few Jews, yes, I would prefer a Jewish site for Jews because it is an outreach source for me and an opportunity to expand my knowledge. Can you understand that?
Posted by: Karin | October 19, 2006 2:27 AM
You need to reread your Torah....Or the King James Version of the Bible, which is the version that came from the Torah. This is just completely inaccurate. The KJV is far from what Jews want to read as a translation of our Torah. As we wander yet further from the original subject of this column...
Posted by: eastcoastlady | October 19, 2006 3:16 AM
Stephen, If I read Homer's Iliad is Zeus speaking with me? If you have the ears to hear. (Although I do side with Plato in thinking that Homer's portrayal of the Gods is somewhat impious...)
Posted by: Erik | October 20, 2006 5:38 AM
You need to reread your Torah....Or the King James Version of the Bible, which is the version that came from the Torah. Actually, the King James Version was translated at least partly from a Hebrew version (the rest was from the Greek), but given that it was done by a bunch of English Christian males with the purpose of making a bible to use in church, I doubt any Jew would consider it even close to the Tanakh. Also, I might remind some of the those that are using these boards to proselytize that they are 1) being rather rude and inconsiderate and 2) are wasting their time, since I would figure that anyone else reading this part of the website feels strongly in their Jewish beliefs. Please take your efforts somewhere else, if you feel you must do them.
Posted by: nicknack | October 29, 2006 2:40 AM