The monologue of the Religious Right is over and a new conversation has begun! Join the God's Politics dialogue with Jim Wallis and friends Brian McLaren, Amy Sullivan, Diana Butler Bass, Tony Campolo, Obery Hendricks, Noel Castellanos, Robert Franklin, Shane Claiborne, and others.

Get e-mail updates



About Jim Wallis
Read His Bio
Events
Press Coverage
Multimedia
Books
Get Sojourners

Archive
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
Add to Technorati Favorites
On Beliefnet
Blog Heaven
Quizzes
Prayer of the Day
Inspiration
Meditations
Prayer Circles
Memorials
News & Society
Home
Huffington Post
Crooks and Liars
TalkingPointsMemo
Street Prophets
Andrew Sullivan
Cross Left
Think Progress
Emergent Village
Bene Diction Blogs On
Chuck Currie
Commonweal
Connexions
The Parish
Faith and Policy
Faith in Public Life
Faithful Progressive
First Born Son
Gathering in the Light
I Am a Christian Too
Imitatio Christi
Jesus Politics
Latino Leadership Circ.
Perspectives
PhaithofStphransus
Philocrites
Pomomusings
Prodigal Sheep
ProgressiveChristianAl
ProChristBlogNet
Public Theologian
Sonafide
Talk To Action
The Anti-Manichaeist
The Corner
Theoblogical
Theoblogy
Waving or Drowning
Willzhead
XpatriatedTexan
 
 
 

Jim Wallis to Ralph Reed: What Do Values Voters Value Most?

Jim WallisThis week I welcome Ralph Reed, the former director of the Christian Coalition and one of the most articulate leaders of America’s Religious Right, to be my first dialogue partner on God’s Politics. We will post our comments and responses to each other, back and forth, all week long--and you can read it all right here.

As you know Ralph, since the 2004 election, the term “values voters” has become a mainstay of the political discussion – and we’re hearing it again this fall. But the discussion has been generally used by its proponents (and the media) to describe one specific kind of voter – a conservative, white, evangelical, Republican. But that is now changing quite dramatically. Because, of course, many voters (maybe even most) are “values voters” – that who they vote for and why are determined by their values.

I believe a debate on moral values should be central in American politics. The question is, of course, which values? Whose values? And how should we define moral values? The problem is when one side of the political spectrum (your side) tries to define values as meaning only two things – opposition to same-sex marriage and criminalizing abortion. And while those two have become “wedge issues” that your side has effectively used for quite partisan purposes, many of the pressing problems our society confronts have an essential moral character. Issues regarding the sacredness of life and family values are indeed very important, and need a much deeper moral discussion; but there is also a broader moral agenda that reflects all the values Americans care about.

So it is actually arrogant to assume that only two issues involve moral values. And it is hubris to say that only those people with a conservative political position on those two issues are voting based on values. What should be valued most is a broader and deeper view of a politics grounded in all our values. What really appeals to the most basic moral concerns of Americans? A deeper discussion of both political principles and issues has the capability of really uniting a large number of people. Ralph?

 
 

 
Recent Posts
Duane Shank: Daily News Digest
Verse of the Day: 'Do justice'
Voice of the Day: Martin Luther King Jr.
Jim Wallis: Welcome!
 

 
Explore Beliefnet
News & Society
Today's Headlines
Complete Politics Coverage

More Faith & Politics
Interview with Jim Wallis
Conservative Blogger Rod Dreher
Responding to a blog post? Read our Rules of Conduct first.