The most important constituency watching last night's Republican debate is the broadly-defined religious right. It is a group in huge transition - more and more evangelicals are rejecting the abortion- and gay marriage-only focus - but, it is obviously the most important group for the Republican primaries. So, the obvious question. Who won the first leg of the Religious Right Derby?
Keep in mind this race, this commentary is only and purely from the perspective of the religious right.
They left the starting gate together and stayed together as a pack during Iraq. They basically said all the requisite things about Iraq - that it was basically a noble cause despite huge screw ups and it was important to keep those radical Muslims at bay.
But then, rounding the first turn Cong. Tancredo shot to the front of the pack..."...if there is a threat to the existence of Israel.. [it] is... I think a potential threat ot he the existence of the United States."
Shortly after that, however, Gov. Romney talked really tough on Osama, "...he is going to pay, and he will die." Not quite Dirty Harry, more like Dirty Jesus.
Romney stretched his lead with his "Gosh. I love you America" answer. "What makes America the greatest nation in the world is the heart of the American people: hardworking, innovative, risk-taking, God-loving, family-oriented American people."
On the Roe v. Wade question, Sen. Brownback makes a bit of a move forward by saying that the day it is overturned wouldn't simply be a nice day or a good day but, "a glorious day of human liberty and freedom."
Mayor Giuliani was showing signs of religious right life too saying it would be ok with him if Roe were repealed.
So into the back straightaway we've got Romney with a good lead followed by Brownback and Giuliani with the rest of the pack on their heels.
Romney puts more distance between himself and rivals, however. He answers the abortion question the way the religious right understands. He's had a change of heart. He's seen the light. He is the political Paul on the road to Damascus. He was once pro-choice, he is now pro-life and to the religious right that makes all the sense in the world. His heart has been changed. Others may call that being a flip-flopper. In this context, however, he has become holier, "I said I was wrong and changed my mind and said I'm pro-life."
Brownback tries to keep up the pace, "I believe life is one of the central issues of our day, and I believe that every human life at every phase is unique, is beautiful, is a child of a loving God, period."
Giuliani is keeping up surprisingly well. Now he is supporting the Hyde Amendment and hating abortion.
But then...a stumble. He's asked about paying for abortions as mayor of NYC. And he defends it. Uh oh. No change of heart. Indeed he's beginning to look...Clintonian... "I'm personally opposed but..."
Meanwhile, Gov. Huckabee calls America "a city on a hill" echoing not only Reagan but Jesus. And then he paraphrases the old "America is great because America is good" line that conservative politicians have been saying Tocqueville said but didn't.
Gov. Thompson says that gay workers have no employment rights. That plays well.
Romney talks comfortably about faith and how important it is. This guy is beginning to sound like Reagan to the religious right.
Brownback is his nearest competitor and he pulls the "we've had 40 or 50 years, now, of trying to run faith out of the public square." That is an important thing for the religious right - that they are being discriminated against...despite Reagan and Bush and Bush and controlling both houses of congress.
Giuliani stumbles more. He is asked about Christian conservatives and their influence in the party and shoves it aside saying sure it is good but he wants to talk about how Democrats are good people too. He has fallen to the rear of the pack and has, perhaps, pulled up lame.
Brownback, meanwhile, is talking about strong families and a strong culture and out of wedlock birth and themes the religious right pushed hard in the 1990s when people like Bob Dole took on Hollywood.
For every move Brownback makes, Romney counters quickly. He starts talking about all he can do as president to counter abortion and Giuliani officially pulls up lame. He says he is pro-choice but is waffling around in a way that only brings Bill Clinton to mind for the religious right. He's for this and against that but only when that happens but all the while he thinks abortion is bad. Uh oh.
Romney is looking like Secretariat. On the embryonic stem cell answer he corrects the moderator who thinks he's blown the question by talking about "altered nuclear transfer" creating embryo-like cells. Minutes later he slams a Sen. Clinton by dissing "Hillary care." For the religious right it doesn't matter how the Clinton's are dissed just that they get slammed.
Giuliani starts talking about "a tamper-proof card, a database" and religious righters everywhere are thinking about that "666" on the forehead - the national ID card that they think the anti-Christ will require (no joke).
Brownback jumps "we don't need a new ID."
But by that time Gov. Romney is across the finish line, in the barn, getting a massage. Not even the evolution question could stop his massive win.
Mitt Romney wins. How big? Think Secretariat at Belmont in 1972:
Gov. Romney still has lots of issues with the religious right. There is his Mormon faith. Many in the religious right think Mormons are cultists. There is his really, really odd taste in fiction - he's said that Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard's Battlefield Earth is his favorite book. But he has broken from the pack and made a believer out of a lot of folks on the religious right.
Sen. McCain was quiet and finished safely in the middle of the pack. Mayor Giuliani is still out there on the track somewhere and Sen. Brownback ran well. Off to the next leg...

Add to Newsvine
And why is lesbian activity notably absent from the Torah? And the relationship between David and Jonathan has been assumed to have a homo-erotic component by several Jewish authorities. And the death penalty in Leviticus has NEVER been imposed by any Jewich court at any time.
I'm tired of the gay thing. I do not understand why any Christian bothers about these people. It is their choice. Same-gender sex acts are never promoted or encouraged and in fact are denounced and opposed soundly from Torah/Tanakh (Old Testament) through the book of Jude. The world is restarted in Revealtion. I wish they (Libs, gays, lesbians Progresives et al) would just invent a new religion and stop trying to infiltrate and corrupt the Christian Church. That is the only reason I bother challenging Liberal and Progressive aims and ideology here at Beliefnet. It's important to remind people with an open mind, that Liberalism and Progressive beliefs are absolutely nothing new. Same old heresy repackaged in neologisms. For example, sex, that is appropriate, is for a man and a woman. The Bible does not hide that fact either. Cultural doesn't change the immutability of that.
You cannot be a person (a liberal), that holds to "anything goes" and not have anything goes. We see the decaying of our society laid at the feet of Liberalism. No doubt about that from the people like me that barely escaped this fact. And sorry Logan from Rochester NY, UU are disproven to be Christians from what the apostles wrote. Not me. There is only one road to heaven according to the quotes written down that Jesus said. And the Apostles never taught a wide tent of acceptance. Are they bigots too? Is Jesus? And the Apostles "and Jesus," spoke directly to Liberal and Progressive ideolgy, actions and behaviors, in what we call "Prophecy." They also dealt with the exact same kinds of people and rhetoric and enemies too.
It is creepy how accurately the 21st century is depicted in the writings of the New Testament. But then again, if all of the bad stuff in the Bible is true, then so is all the good stuff.
Donny, Donny. Hence why I say I am not a 'Christian' by your definition (or what you say the Apostles wrote, I suppose). Unfortunately, try as you might, you cannot monopolize the definition of a Christian. Certainly I am not an orthodox Christian. But you cannot set the terms of this by yourself. Of course I've never heard anyone say "There's only one right religion and-damn-it's hers not mine!" Naturally you would be the guardian of Truth. What can I say? I know: If your "God" is in fact 'the' God who created the heavens and the earth, then I would just as soon prefer to burn in hell. For the record by the way, I talked to Him just this morning so somehow I'm not worried about that :) You are not the only one on this board who has a relationship with the Creator. I communicate quite regularly with Him. I do not read the entire Bible as an inspired book with every word, passage and punctuation inspired and infallable like you. Therefore I leave open the possibility that some things that are attributed to Jesus and the Apostles may never have been said, that some events in the book are fictional and that many parts of simply a product of its time. History is an imperfect record of anything, my friend. I simply believe that you find your own views affirmed in your reading of Scripture and 'Truth', hence why you refuse to consider any alternative. But as I have said before this is the key stumbling block between us. You do seem to be unusually defensive and angry, despite your repeated denials of having any ill will, and I can only feel sorry for someone whose faith is so bitter-or self-righteous. But after all, what is the point of Heaven if someone else isn't damned? I suppose I will find out after death but "warnings" from people like yourself no longer scare me-I can now only feel pity for someone who accepts without blinking a religious teaching that teaches that the vast bulk of humanity is condemned to eternal torment. Unfortunately I can't see any point in our discussions, since your mind is so clearly made up. Instead, I wish peace on you and hope that at some point you can let go of the tremendous hatred that you harbor-that all of us can see but somehow you can't. That may be the plank you need to extract from your own eye, hmm? (Yes, I know the rest of the "judge not lest ye be judged" line) But of course it is not my place to judge. I wish you peace and happiness all the days of your life.
"I'm tired of the gay thing." Then give it up, donny. It really is that simple. "I do not understand why any Christian bothers about these people." Perhaps because "these people" are God's children too? "Inasmuch as ye have done it to the least of these, you have done it unto me." "Love thy neighbour [even thy gay neighbour] as thyself." "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." - Do ANY of these ring a bell for you, Donny? "You cannot be a person (a liberal), that holds to "anything goes". Except, of course, that we don't hold an "anything goes" mindset. Reductio ad absurdum as usual. Try again. But DO BETTER!
Does anyone know why is abortion so important to the Christian right in the USA?
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.