Social Justice: The Intersection of Religion and Politics
Beliefnet’s At Intersection of Faith and Culture blogger Jack Kerwick looks at the ways in which faith and politics, the public and the private, relate to one another.
The question concerning the relationship between faith and politics is one that has arrested the attention of many an American. But it is during election seasons, particularly presidential election seasons, that it assumes a larger than usual importance in the American consciousness. It is during this time that candidates exhaust themselves explaining the respects in which their religious convictions inform their political convictions.
Religion and politics, though conceptually distinct activities, do indeed intersect in all manner of ways. Such encounters are much more frequently than not contentious, and sometimes—as in the present case of President Barack Obama’s confrontation with the Catholic Church—they can be downright acrimonious.
In focusing on this episode, we are able to clearly discern the intimate nature of the connection between “religious liberty” and liberty generally, faith and culture, faith and politics, in American life.
The Obama Administration and the Catholic Church
A couple of weeks ago, while attending mass at my local parish, the priest read from a letter written by the Arch Bishop of our diocese. The subject of the letter was the Health and Human Services Department’s requirement that Catholic institutions provide “free” contraceptives to their employees.
My Bishop, along with Catholic clergy and laity around the country, insisted that Catholics could not and would not comply with such a law, for inasmuch as it both infringed upon Catholics’ “religious liberty” and coerced them to act in violation of their “consciences,” it was unjust.
Although President Obama later announced that Catholic institutions would be exempted from this demand, that only insurance companies would be legally compelled to comply with it, the truth of the matter is that health care insurers will have no economically viable option but to ultimately shift the costs of making these provisions onto the employer—i.e. the Catholic Church. Obama, that is, isn’t making any concessions. He is simply playing the proverbial shell game.