A Coup for Business, but What About Religion?

Roberts may be the GOP's dream candidate for the Supreme Court, if they honestly believe judicial activism is a bad thing.

For those who have been following the public rhetoric since Justice O'Connor's resignation, it must have seemed like there were only two sides in the political fight over her successor on the Supreme Court: the right, which wanted to eliminate both

Roe v. Wade

and the separation of church and state, and the left, which wanted to do the opposite. It looked like a war over morals. Not quite.

As usual, the real power was the power behind the scenes, and in this instance, it was big business. Judge John Roberts, who litigated for large commercial clients as an attorney in private practice at the law firm Hogan & Hartson for a number of years, is a Washington Republican insider par excellence. He was the prime choice of business interests and their advocate, Bush confidante C. Boyden Gray, who heads the conservative Committee for Justice.



On religion issues, it is very hard to tell how Judge Roberts might rule, should he be confirmed to sit on the Supreme Court. He has been a federal judge for a short time, so there is no trail of decisions. Therefore, the only significant record of his work comes from his tenure as special assistant to the U.S. attorney general and associate counsel to the president in the White House Counsel's Office, both during the Reagan administration; his times as deputy solicitor general in the Justice Dept. under the first President Bush; and from his time in private practice.



Advertisement

But it appears that he may well be in the Rehnquist mold: no fan of the separation of church and state, but a believer that there is no First-Amendment defense to illegal conduct in the name of religion.



Roberts was on the brief in

Lee v. Weisman

, when the federal government argued that schools should be permitted to sponsor prayers during graduation ceremonies (an argument the Supreme Court rejected in its ruling on the case). He was counsel to President Reagan when the administration took the position in

Wallace v. Jaffree

that prayer in public schools should be permissible (another loss for the Reagan administration).



Did you like this? Share with your family and friends.
Marci A. Hamilton
comments powered by Disqus
Related Topics: News

Advertisement

Advertisement

DiggDeliciousNewsvineRedditStumbleTechnoratiFacebook