The Humble Hero
Why the American warrior should base post-war actions on a biblical model.
As we watch the scenes of incredible jubilation on the part of the Iraqi people, who are embracing freedom for the first time in three decades, it becomes important to remember the legacy of the reluctant warrior and the humble liberator. America did not move into Iraq out of a sense of inadequacy and inferiority. Our purpose was not to subjugate but to uplift a foreign people. The Saddam Husseins of this world need to put up statues in public squares in order to feel important. Bereft of any inner light, they are dependent on the external spotlight. But the man or woman with a sense of destiny and purpose can afford to take a backseat because what is significant to them is their cause, not their egos.
Most of the world is convinced that America went into Iraq with cynical motives. They believe we're there to dominate the Arabs and steal the oil. Their cynicism is based on one of the pillars of Western civilization, the classical hero invented by Homer, an archetype of the man who undertakes wars for glory, adventure, and plunder. France has its great military heroes who did precisely that, foremost among them Napoleon and Louis XIV. The same is true of Germany with its tyrants Wilhelm II and Hitler. Russia and China are up there with Stalin and Mao. The idea of the reluctant warrior, the hero without a spotlight, the man or woman who sacrifices himself or herself in order to free and inspire others is not a large part of their tradition.
Not so the United States, which is built on the Biblical heritage of Judeo-Christianity. Homer's heroes could not be more different from the heroes of the Bible, and these differences play themselves out in the respective foreign policies of Europe and America.
In the 8th century B.C., in the Greek settlement of Ionia, a blind storyteller named Homer surveyed the men and women around him and was unimpressed with their petty pursuits of their daily lives. Predictable, uninspired, and routine, their lives were hardly the stuff of which movies are made. They had brittle bodies and even more brittle egos. Homer's ingenious response to human ordinariness was to invent a man, Odysseus, who was extraordinary, the classical hero. Here was someone who led a life of epic proportions and cosmic-level struggles. The Iliad and the Odyssey are epics filled with warfare and long, arduous journeys, beautiful women and impossible tasks. All classical heroes who have followed since-from Alexander the Great to Michael Jordan-share five essential characteristics:
1. Their strength is physical and so are their heroic actions.
2. They subdue and triumph over an adversary and revel in the triumph.
3. They receive the adulation of the adoring masses.
4. They receive great material rewards, usually in the form of riches and lovers.
5. Their memory is immortalized in a great tale, and they achieve legendary status.
But rather than create a truly transcendant human being, Homer just increased his insecurity and magnified his mediocrity. Notice how each of the characteristics of the classical hero is born of uncertainty and lack of confidence. Here is a person who spends all his life proving himself to his peers. He exists only when others notice him, feel strong by making others feel weak. He relies on his ability to dominate others to determine his own self-worth.