Draining the Swamp of Terrorists

Our military response is the only one that could be expected given the act of war that was perpetrated on the United States on Sept. 11.

One of the many examples of the moral difference between the United States and its allies, i.e. the civilized world, and our opponents, the forces of barbarism and terror, is that we are taking great pains to minimize civilian, noncombatant casualties and we are targeting only legitimate military targets.

	Religious Support for Fighting Back Warrior Buddhists Buddhists cannot hurt a fly...unless that fly is hurting someone. By Lawrence Pintak Fighting Terrorism Is Moral "If someone comes to kill you, wake up early and kill him first." By Rabbi Joseph Telushkin Advice from a Cold War Theologian Mobilize against attacks, but keep examining your own flaws. Discuss: Religion, just war, and retaliation Complete 9/11 coverage

The terrorists deliberately attacked our civilian population in an attempt to inflict maximum loss of human life, all of it noncombatant. We hold the Taliban accountable for aiding and abetting these murderous thugs. We have a duty to answer acts of terrorism.

We know who the enemy is and it is not the Afghan people. I applaud President Bush for seeking to give emergency relief aid, food and medical kits to the starving Afghan civilian population about whom Osama bin Laden and the Taliban seem to care very little. I imagine that that contrast is not lost on the tens of thousands of Afghans for whom American humanitarian aid will make a life-and-death difference in the coming winter months.

Continued on page 2: »